• stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes, that’s what ‘towards’ means.

    Also check the years on the X-axis and notice the dotted vertical line at 2030. What do you think that vertical line indicates?

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      What does any of that have to do with the blue line clearly leveling off at the 2050 target line far above the 0 goal?

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Do you know you could just write what it means instead of asking? Then you can explain how that invalidates any of what I said. I guess you prefer dragging things out, like how democrats prefer dragging out solutions because “other guy”.

          • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I could, but what fun would that be? It’s way more entertaining to watch someone make statements about a simple graph they don’t even understand.

            Can you even take a guess at what that line indicates?

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              You obviously don’t know, because you have failed to explain why it matters for what I have said. Keep pleasuring yourself over your smug non-helpfulness like your democrat idols.

              • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                You got me- I really don’t know. So let’s try to figure it out together ;)

                Do you think it’s because 2030 is a leap year or something about solar maxima? lol