A great public resource is at risk of being destroyed.
  • PassingThrough@lemmy.worldEnglish
    30·
    7 months ago

    There’s a whole lot going towards ending the web as we know it.

    Censorship, consolidation, AI, greed, to name a few.

    Why, I couldn’t even get into the article before it faded into a paywall.

    I get people want to be paid but splashing cash on every page is not the internet as I knew it.

    Getting to this article from a social site(Lemmy) was also not how I knew it, that’s the consolidation part. After MySpace, in the era of Facebook pages it started. Less personal websites, less websites in general, just get everything from Facebook and Reddit.

    And sure, AI is also going to water down content, with prompts written by cheap corporate lackeys that we will still have to pay subs for after a social site sends us there.

    And then there’s also the censorship and laws coming out to restrict what’s available. First to protect the children while they are young, then more to “protect” them as they get older, and eventually they will know nothing but state approved media.

    To quote the article,

    It’s the End of the Web as We Know It.

    And I’m old and bitter about it. It had good promise, but enshittification took hold as was inevitable.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      7·
      7 months ago

      Why, I couldn’t even get into the article before it faded into a paywall.

      I get people want to be paid but splashing cash on every page is not the internet as I knew it.

      Speaking solely about news, the Internet as you knew it was unsustainable. For the first decade or so of online news, the ad-supported newspaper publishing business subsidized free online news, because they couldn’t figure out payment.

      Then Google and the other ad-tech companies took the advertising dollars, and the old publishing companies took on debt to try and switch to ad-supported online publications. And failed miserably.

      Then the old publishing started running out of money, and slowly switched to online first.

      The remaining published are a shadow of themselves, drowning in debt, and low readership.

      There are alternative models that sort of work, maybe, but they haven’t gone mainstream. They’re held back by the belief that content should be free.

      If platforms like flattr had taken off then the conversation would probably be different.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      7 months ago

      but enshittification took hold as was inevitable

      That’s a given. Every medium of communication ends that way. Start with books, end with propaganda flyers and glossy magazines. Start with radio, end with pirate broadcasts and stations full of ads. TV is about 25% ads and the rest is reality TV. Internet was going to end up that way as soon as things went mainstream.

      • PassingThrough@lemmy.worldEnglish
        7·
        7 months ago

        Absolutely. You can even throw the telephone in there. At the start it was a great way to reach Grandma across the country or the doctor across town. Now most of the traffic on it is robots and extortionists trying to fool Grammy into giving her money for some lie or another.

        I don’t even answer my phone for numbers anymore…be on a short named contact list, leave a voicemail reminding me you are someone I should put on that list, or nothing doing. Sucks for anyone putting me down as an emergency contact though…

        And I feel TV being 25% ads is being pretty conservative…oh, but streaming! Swap the ads and channels you don’t want for a higher per-channel price and no ads…oh, wait, now you get a higher price and the ads!

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyzEnglish
    30·
    7 months ago

    I’ve seen the internet die already, in the early 00s. Google killed it.

    What’s happening now with LLM chatbots is nothing new. And odds are that we’ll handle it just like we did it the last time - finding new ways to sort the noise out of the info.

    • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.caEnglish
      21·
      7 months ago

      Google briefly made the web an amazing, magical place. You could create powerful searches and find almost anything.

      They ruined it once they started focusing more on driving income than driving good search results.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyzEnglish
        5·
        7 months ago

        Yes, Google search did it. And that’s exactly why we allowed it to kill the internet - or rather, we killed the internet with it.

        Older indexing systems relied on human labour, but they sorted and indexed the content by itself; Google instead did it by indirect means (the pagerank algorithm), because automated systems do not understand the content. At the same time that this allowed search to scale further, it also opened room to score higher in those indirect means without better content - SEO.

        That’s exactly what’s happening here, again. LLMs also don’t understand content (here’s some proof), but they’re really good to sort it. They work better than the pagerank algorithm, but they also open room for exploits that the text dubbed LLMO - ways to make your content more likely to be brought up by LLMs without improving it for human readers.

  • Nobody@lemmy.worldEnglish
    8·
    7 months ago

    The dead internet theory. The “conspiracy theory” that’s now becoming an inevitable reality.

  • drawerair@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    6 months ago

    Eventually, people may stop writing, stop filming, stop composing—at least for the open, public web.

    Strong statement by the writer. I guess that 1 of the things that may happen is that the firms behind large-language models will pay creators. I get that creators wanna link or interact with the human audience and that this payment model won’t accomplish that, but if it’ll be good cash, some creators will continue producing public works.

    The fog of the future is thick. We dunno if large-language models will revolutionize the web long-term, or will fade in about 5 years. It’s an interesting time.