• RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    Discussing politics at the work place has been an HR violation for some time, but speaking against the company policy or its customers has always been a fireable ofense. I’m not sure why this surprises anyone.

    Sure, google is an evil corporation and there’s lots of reasons to hate them, but why are we focusing on this specific thing which is common across all workplaces?

    And yes, if you find out your employer is constructing concentration camps and you openly speak against that, you’re probably going to lose your job. Why is this even a question?

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lol you’re getting tossed in jail doing this in a communist society…this isn’t about capitalism at all. It’s about keeping people from creating a hostile work environment, look how polarized politics is online, shit gets heated in a work setting? It’s a no go for any sane company wanting to keep the peace between employees.

        • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          If the employees owned the firm, then no they are not.

          Authoritarian Communism? Yup, it sucks too and I’d call that out.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            There isn’t anything stopping workers now from creating employee own companies. They exist today.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think maybe you’re conflating capitalism and politics.

          The need for workers to voice out against company policies and actions often necessary for safety of workers, customers, etc. This is required for capitalism to work to any standard.

          Its not hard to see how firing employees for noting safety problems can cause problems. The obvious case for this is Boeing where they started punishing people for doing basic quality control work.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Discussing politics at the work place has been an HR violation for some time, but speaking against the company policy or its customers has always been a fireable ofense. I’m not sure why this surprises anyone.

      Looks like a navel-gazing USA thing. Here in Europe I cannot imagine that there’s many companies who’d fire workers for protesting or tells them to shut up forever.

      • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        You should be aware of the fact that Google & the others have offices in Europe and they have the same policy here too. These type of policies fit well within the legal framework in most EU countries. And I guarantee that people would get fired over protests disrupting the workplace if found unwarranted.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not being able to discuss politics at work is not really the case for everyone though, it’s worker politics that aren’t allowed, if the politics agree with the owner class they’ll set up a PAC for it. Whoever heard of an executive or board member fired for discussing politics that paint the organization in a positive light? I also think it’s worth pointing out most companies would fire for this and are authoritative in structure and don’t allow for democratic practices like elections, petitioning, protesting, etc. Just because it’s that way now doesn’t mean it always will be with good labor protections.