• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      7 months ago

      DAE had that one copy of a song that everyone shared with a glitch during the second verse, and now you find it jarring to hear the song without that artifact.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have an old copy of “American Pie” from Napster just like that. Couple little glitches at the start that gave me a twitch for years if I didn’t hear it.

        It’s also what I tell people who like the sound of vinyl. The pops and hisses of vinyl are objectively wrong, but you can get subjectively used to hearing things a certain way. It’s not better, it’s just what you have always done.

        Even that all said, I do like listening to vinyl because the whole process of listening to it is very deliberate. Like I’m preparing for an event and this is what I’ll be doing for the evening.

    • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 months ago

      I miss when you could buy CDs and rip them to your computer so if your shitty mp3 died, you could just move everything on there.

      Degrees of freedom revoked

        • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Seriously. Everyone complains about how it was so much better back then, when you owned your music on physical media.

          Meanwhile, the choice of music available to buy on CD’s (and even LP’s) has never been greater than today.
          Plus, you can easily download whatever you want from any streaming service and burn your own CD’s (but please don’t do that, it violates the TOS and copyright!)

          • jqubed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 months ago

            Or you can buy DRM-free music files at higher quality than was ever available on physical media outside of niche formats that were never widely adopted. Costs are not outrageous and you can listen to them however you like on whatever device you like, and the artists actually get paid and there’s no question of legality.

            • Poutinetown@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah you can literally buy flac instead of relying on CDs to get lossless quality. Also recording these days is so much better, you could easily get a lot of good remastered version of your favorite songs now.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        I bought a CD of Green Day’s “American Idiot” and tried to rip it. The version still sold these days has some kind of copy protection on it that gives rippers fits (which isn’t very punk rock of them). Tried a few different things, and then gave up and downloaded somebody else’s flac rip.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes, that’s what I tried first. There’s a Windows ripper that some people had success with, but didn’t work for me.

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              And it didn’t work? Wierd. Was it mount and copy as files or dding without mounting? Did vlc play cd?

      • jadero@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        You still can. I do it all the time.

        It’s entirely possible that I’ve missed more recent legislation, so take this with a grain of salt. Canada has a “blank media tax” courtesy of the record lobby back in the recording tape days. There was much pushback from consumers when that fee was applied to things like video tapes, recordable CDs, hard drives, etc, but still exists as far as I know.

        The recording industry was pushing for laws more in line with other jurisdictions, primarily the US. The government was open to it, but would then abolish the fees on blank media. Industry backed down because they get more from that fee distribution than they would ever get by having more restrictions. Of course, that doesn’t stop them from trying to shame us or blow smoke up our asses.

        That means we are already paying a licence fee allowing us to copy recorded or broadcast material for personal use. “Personal use” is defined by what it’s not: rebroadcast, playing for the general public, and reselling. Thus, making a strictly personal copy is fine, as is making a copy for a friend, copying from an original you’ve borrowed (from a friend or from the library), recording legal broadcasts (like from radio, etc), and recording concerts unless the terms of admission expressly forbid it, etc.