The aircraft flew up to speeds of 1,200mph. DARPA did not reveal which aircraft won the dogfight.

  • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You mean it should be a war crime, right? Or is there some treaty I am unaware of?

    Also, why? I don’t necessarily disagree, I am just curious about your reasoning.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not OP, but if you can’t convince a person to kill another person then you shouldn’t be able to kill them anyways.

      There are points in historical conflicts, from revolutions to wars, when the very people you picked to fight for your side think “are we the baddies” and just stop fighting. This generally leads to less deaths and sometimes a more democratic outcome.

      If you can just get a drone to keep killing when any reasonable person would surrender you’re empowering authoritarianism and tyranny.

      • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Take WWI Christmas when everyone got out of the trenches and played some football (no not American foot touches the ball 3x a game)

        It almost ended the war

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes the humanity factor is vital

          Imagine the horrid destructive cold force of automated genocide, it can not be met by anything other than the same or worse and at that point we are truly doomed

          Because there will then be no one that can prevent it anymore

          It must be met with worse opposition than biological warfare did after wwI, hopefully before tragedy

    • i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Mines are designated war crimes by the Geneva convention Ottawa treaty because of the indiscriminate killing. Many years ago, good human right lawyers could have extended that to drones… (Source: i had close friends in international law)

      But i feel like now the tides have changed and tech companies have influenced the general population to think that ai is good enough to prevent “indiscriminate” killing.

      Edit: fixed the treaty name, thanks!

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Mines are not part of what people refer to as the Geneva conventions. There is a separate treaty specifically banning some landmines, that was signed by a lot of countries but not really any that mattered.

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes

      Because it is a slippery slope and dangerous to our future existence as a species

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          First it is enemy tanks. Then enemy air. Then enemy boats and vehicles, then foot soldiers and when these weapons are used the same happens to their enemy. Then at last one day all humans are killed