• Adramis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    8 months ago

    I still wonder if they tanked it on purpose. Hanlon’s razor and all that, but it’s just weird how many left-leaning social media sites get bought by right-wing assholes who immediately piledrive it into the ground against all capitalistic reason.

    • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      8 months ago

      Facebook did the same with Instagram the year before. Definitely trying to manage risk by buying and/or killing all the competition.

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 months ago

      The decision to buy is made by numbers before the purchase: returning visitors, time spent etc. “look at how many hours of eyeballs we’re buying”

      The decision to kill the porn is made by social pressure after the purchase: “hey we’ve noticed that in your stable if brands you have some questionable materials. We can’t be associated with that kind of filth, you’re damaging our brand.” - cc processors, advertisers etc. “my wife went on that platform we just bought and you won’t believe what she found” - half the members of the board.

      Most boards are collectively moronic - rarely do you have competent people that can hold serious tense discussion and can reach conclusions without either descending into massive infighting or just coast along the dominant political players.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      As much as I think it could be malicious I am more inclined to believe incompetence. They saw a profitable business and thought they could improve efficiency and keep the market. Little did they account for how much the market wasn’t there for their ideas.