So for obvious reasons, admins think there’s going to be a lot of content in this comm that might fall afoul of our consent rule. As a result, we’re going to apply an enhanced level of scrutiny to c/onoff. Per our sourcing policy, any images in the sub which aren’t OC and aren’t properly sourced (“I found it on the internet” is not a source) are going to be treated with maximum mistrust. If you’re post is even a little bit sus and you can’t provide a source, we will remove the image. Repeat offenders are going to be banned. Remember, at very least we need some indication that the person in the photos is okay with being naked on the internet.

(If anyone here posts anything along the lines of “if they didn’t want to be naked on the Internet then they shouldn’t have taken naked pictures fap fap fap”, I will ban you so hard it’ll kick your whole family offline.)

Look, I get that the thought that a woman in this type of image didn’t want to be naked on the internet is part of the appeal for some people. It’s sexy and exciting to be seeing something secret and private that you’re not supposed to see. I understand the thrill of a safe kind of voyeurism, and the allure of the taboo, I really do. We kindly invite you to have that thrill somewhere else, please.

  • streetweeb@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an online SW, it’s extremely annoying and frustrating when my content gets linked elsewhere without credit, so on behalf of the community I thank you!!