If you listen to Canadian politicians, the solution to our housing crisis seems to be some combination of immigration reform and a herculean countrywide building effort.

But Paul Kershaw, a public policy professor at the University of British Columbia and founder of the affordability advocacy group Generation Squeeze, says the emphasis on increasing housing supply obscures an issue politicians are less likely to address.

Namely, that we, as a country, have become addicted to ever-rising home prices, largely because we’ve been conditioned to see our homes as financial assets.

“There are multiple things we need to do [to reduce prices], and more supply is one of them,” said Kershaw. But funding announcements for building projects are a “way to organize our concern about the housing system so that we don’t have to … look in the mirror — particularly homeowners who have been homeowners for a long time — and say: ‘How are we entangled?’”

He said the current system incentivizes extracting profit from real estate, rather than prioritizing that everyone has access to affordable shelter.

“We need clarity about what we want from housing,” said Kershaw. “And it has to start with: ‘We don’t want these prices to rise any more.’”

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The abundance of supply is really easy with a declining population. It also stalls your economy and causes a ton of other social problems.

    Japan real estate was a massive appreciating asset back in the 80s when the population was increasing.

    Tech advancement regarding earthquakes shouldn’t have any significant impact. It’s not the building that appreciates, it’s the land.

    If anything, low property taxes make it a better investment. Reccuring costs reduce profit.

    So while you’re kinda right with the supply situation, it doesn’t help sort our the problems here.