A man stabbed six people to death at a busy Sydney shopping center Saturday before he was fatally shot, police said, with hundreds fleeing the chaotic scene, many weeping as they carried their children. Eight people, including a 9-month-old, were injured.

New South Wales police said they believed a 40-year-old man was responsible for the Saturday afternoon attack at the Westfield Shopping Centre in Bondi Junction, in the city’s eastern suburbs and not far from the world-famous Bondi Beach. They said they were not able to name him until a formal identification had taken place but that they weren’t treating the attack as terrorism-related.

The man was shot dead by a police inspector after he turned and raised a knife, New South Wales Assistant Police Commissioner Anthony Cooke told reporters.

  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/03/21/chicago-glock-switch-lawsuit/

    The 41-page complaint details dangerous and deadly incidents involving modified Glocks on the streets of Chicago in recent years, including police officers with department-issue Glock pistols facing off against criminals with machine-gun power. Bystanders and buildings have been struck by the bullet spray of modified Glocks, which cause a recoil that is difficult for unskilled or inexperienced users to control, the complaint alleges.

    Even Chicago’s own lawsuit details how inaccurate they are.

    https://abc7chicago.com/chicago-shooting-shootings-crimes-crime/14254533/

    CPD said there were 617 murders in Chicago last year, down from 709 in 2022.

    Enjoy your data.

    • papertowels@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Inaccurate, but it doesn’t say anything about less lethal.

      Bystanders and buildings have been struck by the bullet spray of modified Glocks

      You are once again assuming that the individual is aiming at particular targets, but instead they’re in a shopping center with strangers.

      Finally, even with your provided one year of data, it’s correlation vs causation.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Uhh why would it magically be less than lethal? It’s still a firearm…and no the data is showing this throughout all the innercities where gang violence is high.

        • papertowels@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          To put it succinctly, just because you can’t hit your intended target with an automatic firearm doesn’t mean the danger goes away - oftentimes bystanders get hurt, which is mentioned in the quote you brought up.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I didn’t say it did anywhere. I have stated multiple times that the odds of being killed by someone spraying into a crowd is lower than someone actively aiming at you.

            • papertowels@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              There’s a nuanced difference between odds of being someone being killed by x versus y, and the number of deaths resulting from x vs y.

              My hunch is that spraying into a crowd with an automatic results in more deaths at a faster rate than someone actively aiming, but quite frankly my personal belief is that having a knife severely limited the number of deaths when compared to any firearm.