fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前this one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzimagemessage-square137fedilinkarrow-up11.28K
arrow-up11.28Kimagethis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前message-square137fedilink
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 年前Less work being done by anyone is better. Thinking it’s bad that work is done for us by robots is the brain worms talking.
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 年前Indeed. Ideally AI would do every job, so that humans can focus on just doing what we want to do. It’d be like the whole species getting to retire.
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前 You’d rather cheer for people to lose their jobs without anyone calling you out on it, sure. I’m not the angry one wishing unemployment on my “enemies” here. Who are you? What do you want?
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前The ideal endpoint is to eliminate the concept of “jobs” entirely. Why should people have to work?
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前Okay. So why are you breaking that guy’s balls, over automating away jobs, which you don’t want to exist?
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 年前Because currently we do need jobs. Otherwise why is he upset about AI in the first place?
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Sure seems to be, he said he’s “stoked” for when AI comes for the “tech bros”’ jobs. But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view, rather than you and I speculating about it in a side thread that wasn’t actually about him to begin with?
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前Are you sure you know what stoked means? Because it sure isn’t anger. But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view Or you could’ve asked, rather than repeatedly posturing. Especially when he asked you to stop doing that. You need to examine your behavior throughout this thread.
Less work being done by anyone is better. Thinking it’s bad that work is done for us by robots is the brain worms talking.
Indeed. Ideally AI would do every job, so that humans can focus on just doing what we want to do. It’d be like the whole species getting to retire.
Who are you?
What do you want?
The ideal endpoint is to eliminate the concept of “jobs” entirely. Why should people have to work?
Okay. So why are you breaking that guy’s balls, over automating away jobs, which you don’t want to exist?
Because currently we do need jobs. Otherwise why is he upset about AI in the first place?
Is he?
Sure seems to be, he said he’s “stoked” for when AI comes for the “tech bros”’ jobs. But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view, rather than you and I speculating about it in a side thread that wasn’t actually about him to begin with?
Are you sure you know what stoked means? Because it sure isn’t anger.
Or you could’ve asked, rather than repeatedly posturing. Especially when he asked you to stop doing that.
You need to examine your behavior throughout this thread.
deleted by creator