• Djennik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem is not the amount of people but how much each individual consumes. Getting meat out of your diet is a simple and a small sacrifice. Besides the health benefits there is also the fact that you don’t contribute to the culling of 70 billion animals per year (of which 40% is probably not eaten and thrown in the trash). Not only that but you don’t contribute to the greatest cause of deforestation, antibiotics resistance, decline of biodiversity, water waste, …

    Besides the global population is steadily stagnating (Africa is still booming) as a lot of countries see population decline (less than 2 children per woman).

    • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Couldn’t we just stop food waste? Most food is discarded before even making it to the store. Seems to me being more efficient with how we distribute food is more realistic that trying to convince everyone to go vegan.

      Because I’m not going to stop eating meat and the amount of ppl like me is larger than you think

      • r1veRRR@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many people will also not reduce food waste, for exactly same reasons you won’t stop eating meat. Convenience, habit, cost, time investment.

        • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except those two things are not the same. We already have regulatory organizations that determine how food is handled and distributed. We can’t regulate veganism, we can regulate food waste

          • r1veRRR@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            We could absolutely regulate veganism. Hell, it’s the other way around at the moment. For pretty much every animal rights law, there’s an exception specifically for farm animals. Just removing those exceptions would make factory farming (and therefore like 90% of meat production) illegal.

            And in a more general sense, we absolutely can regulate carnism (aka the opposite of veganism), exactly how we regulate a million other moral questions.

            • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If only we had other examples of bans on certain goods and substances based on minority groups crys about morality. Im sure none of them resulted in billions of wasted dollars, mass incarceration, and the creation of a new black market

      • Djennik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Both are true: reducing waste and adopting a plant based diet are great ways of reducing your footprint.

        The number of vegetarians/vegans is growing quickly. I’m not convincing you of going vegan. You are convincing yourself to keep on eating meat despite the scientific facts and moral consequences.