• AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    8 months ago

    Another title could be “McKinsey & Company asks tone-deaf question and fails to recognize Millennial sarcasm.”

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 months ago

      Love how even the examples make no sense, Like $130 for a week and a half is what like $12 a day? Like what even is a fancy soda or drink in this example? and for a 10 or 11 day stretch $35 on protein bars is the cost of a coffee a day. Hell I wish I could feed myself for only $12 a day.

      "Gen Z, meanwhile, said they often choose high-quality snacks and beverages, which makes for expensive grocery bills.

      One 23-year-old Gen Zer told Business Insider by text that he spends about $130 on groceries for a week and a half. “Fancy sodas and drinks” and “random snacks at Trader Joe’s” account for the bulk of the bill. He also said he spends about $35 on protein bars."

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          If they don’t pay for actual groceries then 12$ a day sounds like a lot for snacks.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            And if they do pay for groceries $12 a day is not abnormal, $4 a meal (assuming they are having 3 a day) is not some highfalutin lifestyle.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      From the article it doesn’t seem like anyone failed to recognize sarcasm. It mentions how times are tough so the “splurge” target is much more mundane and low-cost.

      • AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        “What do you splurge on?”

        “Splurge? If I feel really wealthy, I let myself have a more expensive snack.”

        Seems you missed it, too.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          It comes with bitter humour for sure but the whole thing isn’t some sarcastic joke. And the article and surveyors understood it as what it is. Kids are poor as shit so can’t splurge on almost anything. One thing people spend more than necessary are fancier snacks but that’s about it.

          The article is outrage baiting though which is a tactic that always works.