Plainclothes Chicago police officers fired nearly 100 gunshots over 41 seconds during a traffic stop that left one man dead and one officer injured, according to graphic video footage a police oversight agency released Tuesday.

Five officers from a tactical unit who were in an unmarked police vehicle surrounded an SUV last month driven by Dexter Reed, allegedly for failing to wear a seatbelt. Video shows the 26-year-old Black man briefly lowering a window and then raising it and refusing to exit the vehicle as more officers arrived, yelled commands and drew weapons.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        No mention in your bio that you’re unable to read the article before commenting?

        I did actually, which is why I came back and made my comment on this post.

        I’m purposely criticizing the person who made the summary of the post, as it tends to indicate trying to direct a conversation in a certain way, without expressing all the summary facts.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          5 months ago

          Why would surrounding a vehicle with gunmen who get out of an unmarked vehicle be a proper response to not wearing a seatbelt?

          Imagine if we just sent the ticket to their house and didn’t hold up traffic with the dash/rear cameras like a speed trap would do. No officers in danger, no people feeling in danger.

          Unmarked vehicles in themselves are questionable. 5 officers in 1 vehicle… strange

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            5 months ago

            Woah there. The full charge was “not wearing a seatbelt while black”.

            This is standard procedure for such crimes.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I never said any of that.

            All I stated was that the summary was crafted in such a way as to not present all the available facts to the readers.

            My understanding is a police officer was shot first, by the driver. None of that was mentioned in the summary.

            Do I believe the police forces throughout the nation have a huge problem that need fixing? Absofuckinglutely.

            But we’re not going to fix things if we don’t look at the whole truth of a situation, and only the partial truth.

            • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              5 months ago

              But we’re not going to fix things if we don’t look at the whole truth of a situation, and only the partial truth.

              That’s what a summary is tho … simply a portion of the whole.

              The complete story is in the article. Therefore read it first before commenting.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              I never said you said those things, I said them. That’s why I used the term imagine. Sorry if you thought I was trying to pick at your words.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I do agree they chose to put their lives on the line so should accept the risk before putting other civilians at risk. I also think police should generally be unarmed, because it’d force them to de-escalate and not give them the ability to easily end lives.

        That said, never? There are times where it’s OK. Even the most civilian friendly police forces in the world still occasionally see the need to shoot someone. There are people who just need to be stopped before they cause more harm.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                What are you talking about? It’s significantly more likely that someone will cause harm to a non-cop than a cop, or that harm will be caused by a non-cop than a cop as well. The way policing works is totally fucked, but there is absolutely a need for something. 99.9% of the time it should be de-escalation, but to pretend like that 0.1% is nothing is so ignorant. You can hate cops and be reasonable.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          I hope I take at least two with me, and bring some measure of peace and justice to the world.

          I’m not really expecting to; kind of a terrible shot, but dreams are dreams.