• hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Turning your nose up at SBC isn’t being a codec snob; it’s having functioning ears.

    And if you’re on Android, AAC is not well implemented compared to on iOS / MacOS. Maybe this has changed in the past couple years but it was immediately noticeable to me when I upgraded from the WH-1000XM3s to the XM4s, I could immediately tell that the audio was worse if they weren’t using LDAC. And these don’t have LDAC.

    Unlike with competent compression codecs (mp3 vs AAC vs FLAC), where most people genuinely cannot tell the difference between a well-compressed song vs a lossless one, many people can immediately tell the difference between AptX and AAC or SBC on Android.

    There are plenty of true wireless headphones out there that support LDAC or AptX for less than $100. It’s not surprising to me that people in their target audience would think $150 for something that sounds terrible to them isn’t reasonable.

      • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You don’t think the Bluetooth codec makes a difference when you’re using Bluetooth headphones? When else would it make a difference?

        I feel like you’re just confusing the codec used for compressing audio for storage and wireless transmission with the codec used for transmission via Bluetooth. That or you’ve just never experienced a setting where a better codec was being used.

        SBC can sound okay, but see here for a breakdown of why it almost never actually does. Basically, it’s capped at only using a fraction of the available bandwidth, even though it could use more if not for arbitrarily imposed limitations.

    • Zpiritual@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Running sbc at higher bitrates than default sound subjectively better than most existing codecs. I use 552 kbit/s regulary and it sound great. Unfortunately the support for higher sbc bitrates is terrible.

      • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve not been able to listen to high bitrate SBC myself, but that tracks with my understanding, too. I read this article - https://habr.com/en/articles/456182/ - recently, when trying to confirm my understanding of why there’s such a huge difference in sound quality from codec to codec.

        What setup do you have where you’re able to listen to 552 kbps SBC?