A person with a ticket matching all six Powerball numbers in Saturday’s $1.3 billion jackpot came forward Monday to claim the prize, Oregon officials said.

The lottery ticket was purchased at a Plaid Pantry convenience store in the northeast part of the city, Oregon Lottery said in a statement.

Oregon Lottery is working with the person in a process that involves security measures and vetting that will take time before a winner is announced.

“This is an unprecedented jackpot win for Oregon Lottery,” Oregon Lottery Director Mike Wells said in the statement. “We’re taking every precaution to verify the winner before awarding the prize money.”

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Uh huh. I guess that’s why most people who inherited their parent’s money are all living on the street now.

    • Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      “I’m just so happy that finally Oregon won the big jackpot because it’s always on the East Coast,” Musser said. “Now that Oregon won it … there’s more hope for Oregon. Maybe we’ll win it again.”

      I wonder if there’s any truth to this or it’s just confirmation bias on her part. It says just before that the largest Powerball jackpot ever was won in California…

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, I feel like most of the jackpots have been in CA. I know at least two of the billion dollar ones were in CA.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          You would except 10% of the winners to be from California, all else being equal.

      • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        There is no truth to this. A win in Oregon does not increase or decrease the chances of a future win in Oregon. The probabilities are fully independent of one another. There is no plausible means by which the probability of a future drawing selecting a ticket held in a particular state is affected by the residences of previous winning ticket holders.

        The idea that “X just won, therefore X is on a roll and will continue to win” and “X hasn’t won in a long time, therefore X is overdue for a win and should win in the near future” are both examples of the Gambler’s Fallacy.