• zefiax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ok? And? They aren’t a charity and don’t owe you free video hosting services.

      EDIT: I find it hilarious that point out the fact that you aren’t entitled to free hosting services is getting down voted. Lmao how old are the people here?

      • Gork@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Dude they sell our data to advertisers and big data for profit. The least they can do is provide some services for us for the amount of analytics they collect from us on a daily basis.

        • zefiax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          As someone who’s actually worked in this industry, your data isn’t enough to pay for video hosting services to the scale youtube provides. Youtube makes up a significant chunk of all network traffic in the world. It costs money.

            • zefiax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              No i am not. But I am happy to support actual content creators and the platform that they host on and gets them the most views because I spend more time on YT than I do on any other streaming platform.

                • Shrek@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They pay content creators more than any other platform to my understanding. I think the exception is kik (kick?) The streaming platform.

                  • xts@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Too bad you constantly have to be worried about dumb policy changes that can affect your older videos which can mean cutting off those revenue sources

                    Also I’ve never seen another platform that demonetizes content as much as YouTube does.

        • Dale'sDeadBug@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dude, they ARE the advertiser. That’s Google’s main business. They have no incentive to export ANY of your account data to 3rd parties. Business tell them what groups of people to advertise to, and their systems handle the rest. They’re open about how it all works.

      • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        They were already being paid and profitable, both from direct cash and ad revenue, but that doesn’t ever seem to be enough.

        • zefiax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are free to disagree with their pricing and cancel a subscription if you have one. That’s how the free market works.

          • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Free market works” is by itself a very questionable statement.

            But there sure are some more options beyond that. Although some people think we shouldn’t be free to pick them.

            • zefiax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              You are free to pick w.e you want. That doesn’t make someone actually paying for a decent platform a corporate shill.

              • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                Our definitions of “decent” are definitely different. But this is not just about what you choose to do, it’s about all the fingerwagging people do at people who don’t believe this is worth paying (even more) for.

                • zefiax@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The only finger wagging going on is people calling people corporate shills for actually paying for a service.

                  • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Then you need to look better because you are down a thread pointing out how people are getting downvoted and ragged on for suggesting ad blocking options.

                    I find it hilarious that point out the fact that you aren’t entitled to free hosting services is getting down voted.

                    Actually nevermind. Just look at the mirror. You really are talking of Google like it’s a struggling charity.

      • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        And I don’t owe them a subscription if I don’t agree with the value they’ve placed on it. Free market, baby. 👍

          • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            You seem oddly offended at the idea people wouldn’t lol. I don’t know why you’re taking this so personally.

            • zefiax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              No I just think it’s stupid to call people who would pay for a service a corporate shill. I have no issue with someone who doesn’t think a subscription is worth it. Maybe read the whole thread first next time.

      • mrmanager@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        No but I’m not going to pay Google for anything. It’s obscene to give them even more money.

        • zefiax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Whether you think that service is worth it or not is up to you.

          But don’t act like you have some moral high ground here and that people who are actually paying for a service that you are stealing from and a service that actually shares revenue with it’s content creators and encourages independent creators are just corporate shills.

          Some of us are adults and realize things cost money and not entitled children that expect everything for free.

          • dezmd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            And some of us are adults that don’t have your innate need to wield your moral high ground like a smug pedantic asshole.

              • dezmd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                And yet that’s obivously not what this thread’s context was before you started self-jerking to moral superiority.

                Have some self awareness.

                This isn’t a Wendys Drive Thru.

                • zefiax@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Here, since you have difficulty following, let me copy where the original thread started.

                  The amount of downvotes on comments trying to help people not get price gouged and comments supporting these subscription price increases shows me just how many corporate shills are actually out there. No wonder these corps keep getting away with this bullshit.

                  I am not the one who started the moral superiority, I just disagreed at being called a “corporate shill” before a bunch of insecure assholes started losing their shit.

                  Maybe try having self awareness yourself before suggesting it to someone else.

                  • dezmd@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Self inserting as a main character to claim you’ve been attacked so you can shill your moral superiority is the cherry on top of your bullshit sundae.