• CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You mean the third adaptation of a very popular book? Not exactly wildly original.

      Still a great movie though.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not original exactly, but the 1984 version was critically panned, and most people don’t even know the scifi miniseries even exists. It was said by most people to be unadaptable after those attempts. Taking the step to out that kind of money behind it is pretty bold, and it’s original in that there’s nothing else like it in the cinema right now, or in a while.

      • TheBlue22
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Because adapting a book that is considered unadaptable isn’t bold

        • Glytch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          8 months ago

          This version of it is by far the best and really does the book justice, but “bold” is not a word I would use to describe the third adaptation of the same classic piece of literature.