I recently set up a LLM to run locally on my desktop. Now that the novelty of setting it up and playing with different settings has worn off, I’m struggling to come up with actual uses for it. What do you use it for when not doing work stuff?

  • @reversebananimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    323 months ago

    The only thing I’ve found them actually useful for is generating random lists for my D&D games.

    When it comes down to needing some mundane descriptions, its great having an LLM brainstorm for you. “Give me 10 examples of weird things I might see in jars in a witch’s hut.” This works well because you can just cut the 5 you don’t like and use the other 5 to brainstorm your final list.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍
      link
      fedilink
      English
      123 months ago

      This is the only thing I use it for in personal life. Every town my players visit now has a gift/t-shirt shop - I feed it details of the location have it spit out 20 t-shirt ideas and 5 are something I can work with. My players have started collecting t-shirts.

      Or I describe a monster or bit of homebrew and have it suggest names, I suck at names. GPT also sucks at names but after enough suggestions there’ll be something that works.

    • @other_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      Yes, I absolutely love this. I bought a deck of attack description cards that make hits feel more interesting by describing the action in cool ways, but it had nothing for misses, so I fed chatGPT some examples from the ‘hit’ list and asked it to make me a miss one, and it’s been great.

  • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Brainstorming ideas; it’s something to bounce ideas off and see what can be tweaked.

    Single-player D&D. Can setup multiple players/characters and a DM and just play D&D by myself, which is rad.

    Having conversations with fictional characters. Like Data from Star Trek.

    • @Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Okay ive seen this kind of usage now 3 or 4 times and im at a complete loss how that even works.

      Starting to feel very out of touch with reality :(

      Edit: meant to say technology not reality but im just gonna leave the correction as this edit

        • @Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          I cant fathom how to playtest dnd with it. That concept does not compute.

          I think ide have to see it in action

          • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Oh I’m not playtesting, I’m straight up playing the game using the AI as the DM and 3 other players. I’m using an AI that can pretend to be multiple characters at once and then they’re trained on the rules of the game as well as just having general writing ability to create actions their characters take, while also having a dice-roller integrated into it.

            It’s more imaginative than how most play, using a map and minis; this is entirely text and RNG numbers for dice. Imagine doing an RP session in a Discord chat and you’ll get the idea. Just instead of real people, it’s AI (except for myself).

            The genius of it is that even if the AI misinterpreted the rules, it’s still like playing with real people since they do that too! lol

  • AlexanderESmith
    link
    fedilink
    183 months ago

    Absolutely nothing, because they all give fucking useless results. Hallucinates, is confidently wrong, and isn’t even grammatically competent (depending on the model). Not even good for a draft, because I’d have to completely rewrite it anyway.

    LLMs are only as good as the guys training it (who are mostly morons), and the raw data they train on (which is mostly unaudited random shit).

    And that’s just regular language. Coding? Hah!

    Me: Generate some code to [do a thing].
    LLM: [Gives me code]
    Me: [Some part] didnt work.
    LLM: Try [this] instead.
    Me: That didn’t work either.
    LLM: Try [the first thing] again.
    Me: … that still doesn’t work…
    LLM: Oh, sorry. Try [the second thing again].
    Me: …

    Loop continues forever.

    One time I found out about a built-in function that I didn’t know about (in LLM generated code that didn’t work), and read the manual for it, and rewrote the code from scratch to get it working. Literally the only useful thing it ever gave me was a single word (that it probably found on Superuser or StackExchange in the first place).

    • @Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      Wow, you get two whole answers?! Lucky, I just get the same goddamned response repeatedly until I yell at it or until it gives up.

  • Julian
    link
    fedilink
    English
    173 months ago

    Nothing because it sucks and isn’t worth the effort if you have an Internet connection and any knowledge on how to use a search engine.

    • @leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      If you are not sure how to search for a specific problem and can just describe it in a few sentences then it’s definitely worth the effort.

      And for the state many search engines are in today that is sometimes the better way to find stuff.

  • @CumBroth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Among other things: Cooking. They’re really helpful in those situations where I have a bunch of ingredients lying around in my pantry but I lack concrete recipes that can make a proper meal out of them.

    • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      The idea of an imagined recipe based on random ingredients from a thing that doesn’t understand the concept of taste seems like a “recipe” for some really gross food.

  • @kazren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    133 months ago

    Messing with a win11 laptop recently, I asked copilot how to disable copilot. After a couple of tries it told me.

    That’s about it.

  • TipRing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    123 months ago

    I used openAI/whisper to transcribe several thousand .wav files full of human speech (running locally). Much faster than trying to listen to them myself. It wasn’t perfect but the error rate was within acceptable levels.

  • @j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    103 months ago

    Friend, code, search engine, writing, cooking ideas, sexy time, exploring psychology, therapist, etc.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Sexy time? You use it to talk to you erotically?

      • Pendulum
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Virtual partners are indeed a thing.

        One of the more popular ones a few months ago decided to nerf the sexy time talks, which was intersting in how much it emotionally hurt users. They described feeling like their virtual partner was no longer the same person that they’d fallen for. Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2023-03-01/replika-users-fell-in-love-with-their-ai-chatbot-companion/102028196

        There are also huge fears of how much data harvesting they are capable of performing.

        I’m in two minds. On one, they are definitley not real. They are code. But on the other, the epidemic of lonely human beings is only getting worse with time and not better, and anything that can help people feel less lonely has to be a good thing, right?

  • I occasionally use LLMs to generate a set of characters for a TTRPG, if I don’t have the time to prepare and/or know we’ll play a very limited scenario in terms of who my PCs are able to meet. This is especially true for oneshots where I just don’t want to put too much work in.

    I recently built a scenario for a cthulhu themed scenario, that was set in a 1920s Louisiana prison and planned for two to three sessions. I just had an LLM do a list of all the prisoners and guards on the PCs block, with a few notes on the NPCs look and character. This drastically reduced the time I had to put in preparing the scenario.

  • Wereduck
    link
    93 months ago

    I use Chatgpt 3.5 both personally and at work for tip of the tongue questions, especially when I can’t think of a word. Sometimes as a starting point when I have trouble finding the answer to a question in Google. It can sometimes find an old movie that I vaguely remember based on my very poor descriptions too.

    For example: “what is the word for a sample of a species which is used to define the species” - tip of the tongue, holotype. “What is the block size for LTO-9 tape” - wasn’t getting a clear answer from forums and IBM documentation is kind of behind a wall, needed Chatgpt to realize there was no single block size for tape.

    It’s excellent for difficult to search things that can be quickly verified once you have an answer (important step, as it will give you garbage rather than say it doesn’t know something).

    • needed Chatgpt to realize there was no single block size for tape.

      Did it clearly say so or did you figure it out because it gave incompatible or inconclusive answers?

      • Wereduck
        link
        23 months ago

        It did say so directly, something that I couldn’t find in a Google search because I was asking the wrong question, and getting forum posts with loosely related technical questions about LTO.

        That’s not to say that it doesn’t just as often give weird answers, but sometimes those can guide me to the right question too.