• Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Which is all of them. All of them need to be connected, it’s how they operate now. Most of them have decency to not do shit like that, but that might change at any point

    • StringTheory@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Time to pull up my big boy undies and start riding my bike. That sucker ain’t controlled by anyone but me. <middle finger to the car companies, wobbles down the road on a two-wheeler>

    • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I doubt even all new cars require internet connection and there’s a shit ton of older models that don’t either. Definitely not “all of them”

      • grue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I still own only cars from the '90s and 2000s because of this issue (along with stuff like telemetry spying on you, etc.). However, even if just driving old cars forever works for me, it’s hardly a solution for society in general simply because there aren’t enough old cars for everybody to have one, let alone all the other problems with it.

        These companies are trying to destroy our property rights in order to engage in unethical and abusive rentiership. The correct solution is legislative, not just to ignore them and hope they’ll stop!

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, maybe not 100% of them, you are technically correct. For example, some Chinese companies are selling very cheep cars that are basically a reskin of the older cars from 1960th.