• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    No because you’re making blood from nutrients with microplastics mixed in. That’s how it would hypothetically accumulate there in the first place. If it were being filtered out of the blood by another organ then I could see a case for scraping/removal but if it’s the blood then it’s coming directly from your food and drink and will be the same ratio even after bloodletting and/or regeneration.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Let’s say you keep dripping slightly muddy water into a bucket. Over time, the mud will settle and accumulate in the bucket, while the clearer water will overflow. Now suppose you cut a slit at the base of the bucket. Now the mud will flow out through it and the water in the bucket will become less muddy, even though new muddy water is still dripping in. Here the bucket is your bloodstream, the slightly muddy water is your food, and the mud is microplastic.

        • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          The problem is that things like microplastics cannot be removed easily. (This is called bioaccumulation.) But if you bleed and lose some blood, the new blood will take time to accumulate.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            If it flows out when the blood moves then it wouldn’t accumulate there in the first place. I’m not sure what you’re having difficulty with here.