• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    China is an odd one to attack. There’s no historical grievances and China is making a lot of positive inroads all across the Islamic World. Seems like they’d pick a different target.

    • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      China is more unusual, but the Islamic world is not a simple, singular thing. Religion can be hostile to near faiths. If catholics are burning protestants(or vice versa) I wouldn’t thinking making friends with one, would endear you to the other. Even if you are friends with the Taliban, Isis doesn’t really care. To them the Taliban aren’t pure enough. No one but them are. Reaching out to the rest of the Islamic world may be seen as a negative to them.

      If they are next to China, and china is not them, that may be enough for them to justify it to themselves. Religious extremists don’t tend to make perfect sense to people who see the world as it is.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        Weird how all the other extremists seem to have definite and concrete grievances whereas ISIS seems to just be randomly generated chaotic NPCs

        • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          All other extremists? The guy who shot up Christchurch? Was his grievance legitimate? The guys who burn synagogues? When the kkk bombed a church killing 3 children? I don’t think they were from my view. They aren’t chaotic, but their rational is not based on things outside of religion. I don’t see that as npc things. They are human, and humans do not all see things the same. I’m not the one putting my views on them. They say they feel a way, and I believe them. For some reason you can’t. It must be the cia, or America. I’ll give you one thing. The circumstances that created them were certainly the fault of the US intentional or not.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            8 months ago

            Did I say anything about legitimacy? No! I said definite and concrete. Even if their beliefs are bullshit they still believe in something!

            Their religion isn’t “kill everyone” so who they target is selective. This honestly comes across as Islamophobia - ‘they’re just monsters, who knows what they motivated by!’

            Why did they select China?

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                8 months ago

                Maybe, but it strikes me as strange that they hate all other sects and national groups except the Uyghurs. Also, they’d be the only group that actually does care outside the West. Very strange.

              • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Not really maybe. In the article they say it, but neofacist cartoon character pic over here you are replying to probably didn’t read it. They say it’s for the Uyghurs and the support of the Taliban. They don’t like the taliban because they are their local authority.