• TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nobody is disputing that.

    The value of the tree ironically does go up a lot over time. But it’s still the value of the tree. The value of everything else is still a cost and that is EXACTLY THE POINT I MADE. The cost of the tree is insignificant compared to the house and you’re hotel bills.

    Reading comprehension… It’s a glorious thing, and lost on Americans.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      My fellow lemming. You made a terse comment that was prone to misinterpretation. People misinterpreted it.

      I see what you’re trying to say, and I see how people are understanding it differently than you may have intended.

      I’m not saying your underlying message was wrong, certainly a rusted old bridge is momentarily not worth the same money that it was when it was installed, but that’s not how you seem to have been interpreted.

      I won’t tell you what to do, but if I may make a suggestion: it may be prudent to be a little less terse.

      Have a good day.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      The point you made?

      Someone said replacing the bridge would cost billions and you called them out saying that it’s rusty and decaying.

      And the value of trees is a complicated subject. A significant part of my life is dealing with trees and the laws surrounding them for a municipal government.