• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    That is the UK court’s concern, but I don’t see how he could possibly be convicted of that in the US given he’s not an American national. Sounds like the UK court just wants assurances he will not face any capital charges regardless of how flimsy the charges may be.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s like any other country. When you set feet on US ground you are under US law. All the laws. Doesn’t matter if you are a foreign national or not.

      Edit: if any of you travel internationally you would know this. At least I hope you would.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          That doesn’t matter. Charges are in a sealed indictment. I doubt they have anything to do with his publication. He helped Chelsea Manning hack into a US military server. That’s esponge and computer theft. But, it is not known what the charges are because they are sealed.

          • 520@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It does though. As someone who isn’t a US citizen, resident or visitor, he isn’t subject to US laws.

            What he is subject to is the laws of the country he was residing in, and any extradition treaties they have with the US. What he allegedly did was a crime there too, which is important as most countries will not extradite if what the subject did wasn’t criminal in both countries, if they were still in the request-recipient country at the time.

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              No, if he is extradited he answers the charge. If he is in a country that has a prior charge then the respective justice departments work out who has priority. In this case he was already charged in Britan before being indicated in the US with extradition requested

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        To my knowledge, Carlisle v. United States establishes that non-U.S. citizens are beholden to US treason laws only if and during the time that they resided within the US which I believe Assange never has. I’m positive other charges will apply to him but I’m specifically talking about capital offenses.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t believe treason is applicable. But, it’s not unusual for some countries, Britain included, to question US charges on extradition. They don’t believe in the death penalty. Since the indictment is sealed, they don’t know.