• Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    This doesn’t rely on critical thinking. It just relies on understanding what “.length” does, which would’ve been previously covered in the lessons.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Well, both. If you rushed through without recalling that length has specific meaning relative to strings, even though you do know that, that’s a critical thinking failure. But yeah, not knowing strings could do it too.

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you didn’t know the answer, it’s a critical thinking exercise? Not at all.

        Answering this question relies completely on understanding programming. A correct answer cannot be reached without an understanding of programming.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          A correct answer cannot be reached without an understanding of programming.

          Yes. It does not follow, though, that knowledge of programming always leads to a correct answer. Since you seem like someone who might appreciate a formal logical description, you are affirming the consequent here.

          Again, without sufficient critical thinking one might just miss the detail that “Monday” is a string and not a custom unit-of-time object, inheriting from Day.

          • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            But you can only mistake it as a custom object of you understand how coding works. I’m not saying an understanding will prevent you from being wrong, I’m saying having critical thinking will not reach the answer if you don’t have an understanding.