On stuff outside of lemmygrad, we are receiving a lot of hate, especially by those who just moved from Reddit. Guess they lost their hidden privilege at Reddit as their rhetoric used to be almost universal over there, while genzedong and our other subs get censored and banned. And now, on lemmy, their stuff isn’t universal, as we are more prevalent here. Seems like they really want that hidden privilege back

  • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    Usually it means someone that actually reads history and will specifically debunk common anticommunist myths about it, i.e. historical revisionism.

    The term “authoritarian” is also used selectively by anticommunists and this pervades capitalist societies, who continue to teach cold war nonsense. It is implicitly reserved for actions of the state, for example, but this is a false distinction made solely because after any kind of a left takeover, the state is the most powerful tool the people have. Universal government healthcare is authoritarian by this selective definition. On the other hand, the assertion of massive control over people’s lives is not described as authoritarian when it comes from the private sector. Workers spend 8-16 hours per day working in petty dictatorships, working around the personalities and whims of business owners and managers, just to ensure some kind of steady income lest they lose basic human security. They are forced to migrate by poverty forced by capitalism, this system creates marginalised groups and then (sometimes slowly) treats them genocidally. Much of it was built on colonialism and neocolonialism, with the richness of the West built on uneven exchange with everyone else, a system set up at gunpoint. None of this is described as authoritarian.

    Please read more widely.

    • GrandmasterFrank
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Much of it was built on colonialism and neocolonialism, with the richness of the West built on uneven exchange with everyone else, a system set up at gunpoint. None of this is described as authoritarian

      I would agree those are authoritarian

        • GrandmasterFrank
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I would gladly recognize the American empire’s atrocities, I just didn’t think it was necessary since most left-leaning spaces are up to date on them, and it would largely be preaching to the choir.

          • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 years ago

            My point is about the unconscious selective use of language, in this case to vilify communists. It’s not a coincidence that the term pops up so often in the imperial core to crap on (usually BIPOC-led) successful revolutions and their theory, usually anti-imperialist struggles. Double standards and uneven emphasis are the primary tools of propaganda and they’ll have you doing their work for them for free.

            • GrandmasterFrank
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              unconscious selective use of language, in this case to vilify communists

              That’s true, the Red Scare has had a lasting impact on American culture, and that impact can still be seen in vocabulary today.

              the term pops up so often in the imperial core to crap on (usually BIPOC-led) successful revolutions and their theory, usually anti-imperialist struggles

              There is certainly a racial aspect to it, some of the most dehumanizing things I’ve ever read were about China and Communism specifically, but I don’t think that precludes legitimate criticisms of authoritarianism.

              • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                2 years ago

                The inconsistency of even using the term makes it more or less useless for categorizing anything meaningfully. In practice, it has become an aimless pejorative that seems to have more utility as an anarchist dog whistle for identifying each other than having anything meaningful to say about anything else.