• The Cuuuuube
      link
      fedilink
      English
      403 months ago

      They used the long tentacle arms to quickly thwip through the jungle

  • @weariedfae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    503 months ago

    Oh for sure, without a doubt. Hell it took forever for people to figure out feathers.

    Then again, on rare occasion we do get some cool skin/soft tissue evidence like that Nodosaurus in Canada. Sometimes they’re strikingly similar to what we thought (or not?). I am not a paleontologist and I am speaking out of my ass.

    That Nodosaurus is super cool though, y’all should see it.

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    223 months ago

    What’s the current consensus, did dinosaurs look more like chickens?

    • @Wirlocke
      link
      English
      12
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      From what I know, most raptors had feathers and that’s where birds came from.

      The broader group of theropods, including the T-Rex, had a precursor to feathers literally called “Dinofuzz”.

      All other kinds of dinosaurs I believe are actually scaly like we thought.

      • The Octonaut
        link
        fedilink
        English
        163 months ago

        This is still not something we can answer with certainty. For a couple of years there, paleontology thought that psittacosaurus had feathers on its tail - and as a ceratopsian, on the complete other side of the dinosaur ‘tree’, that would suggest the base form for dinosaurs must have feathers and any that didn’t have them lost them at some point in their lineage (and thus could potentially regain them if the DNA was deactivated rather than lost). Now the feathers are disputed again, as “something else” - spines of some sort unrelated to feathers.

        No doubt lots of dinosaurs were scaly, but I don’t think anyone would say with certainty that feathers were limited to late theropods.

    • @burgersc12@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      Check out Prehistoric Planet, they say they used the latest research to make the dinos, feathers and all

    • @KillingAndKindess
      link
      English
      363 months ago

      Mammals only got yeeted to their own evolutionary tree branch 40 million years prior to those that would be considered reptilian (sorta dinos too) which was somewhere in the realm of 250 million years ago.

      Meaninng the reptiles of today are ~5x further apart in time from dinosaurs, than dinosaurs are from their common ancestors to mammals.

      I think we really should just not bother thinking in terms of current speciation concepts. They could have had jellyfish like tentacles dangling allover their skin and we’d never know.

      • @Zoop@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        Mammals only got yeeted to their own evolutionary tree branch 40 million years prior to those that would be considered reptilian (sorta dinos too) which was somewhere in the realm of 250 million years ago.

        As someone who was raised and taught to believe that the earth was only a few thousand years old (by ‘that kind’ of Christians/churches,) this still blows my mind to read! I’ve known what I was taught was bullshit for at least around fifteen years, but it’s like my little pea brain still just cannot compute it. Wild stuff!!

        • @KillingAndKindess
          link
          English
          33 months ago

          I grew up with a mix of some who shared that view. Its remarkable the box they place their God in to fit their worldview innit? Lol

    • @nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      A better comparison would be today’s birds, which descended from theropods and are the only remaining members of the clade Dinosauria.