Not sure if this was already posted.

The article describes the referenced court case, and the artist’s views and intentions.

Personally, I both loved and hated the idea at first. The more I think about it, the more I find it valuable in some way.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    6 months ago

    Performance art is wild, often misunderstood. The entire point is to outrage men and he took the bait lol. The artist is clearly getting off on this, staging shit in even more locations because of the lawsuit.

    • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 months ago

      Weird. I can easily see someone doing the same thing but banning women and you wouldn’t say “they took the bait” when women get mad about it.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      When did trolling become a profession? I am not a particularly good artist but I still enjoy making stuff for people and knowing that they are happy with what I make.

    • RedFox@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I hope the court room shenanigans don’t actually distract from the validity. People tend to get distracted easily from thinking about something challenging.