Assailants burst into a large concert hall in Moscow on Friday and sprayed the crowd with gunfire, killing over 60 people, injuring more than 100 and setting fire to the venue in a brazen attack just days after President Vladimir Putin cemented his grip on power in a highly orchestrated electoral landslide.
The Islamic State group claimed responsibility for the attack in a statement posted on affiliated channels on social media. A U.S. intelligence official told The Associated Press that U.S. intelligence agencies had learned the group’s branch in Afghanistan was planning an attack in Moscow and shared the information with Russian officials.
It wasn’t immediately clear what happened to the attackers after the raid, which state investigators were investigating as terrorism.
The attack, which left the concert hall in flames with a collapsing roof, was the deadliest in Russia in years and came as the country’s war in Ukraine dragged into a third year. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin called the raid a “huge tragedy.”
Putin doesn’t seem to be very creative.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Russian_apartment_bombings
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/23/whos-to-blame-for-the-moscow-massacre-isil-ukraine-or-russia-itself
Since some people aren’t making the connection, Al Jazeera spells it out.
Dang. We’re already spreading misinformation as though it’s fact?
I can see the snowball effect already. It’s too late. Everyone now believes Putin is responsible for this and will think that till the end of time.
Good job, redditor.
How dare we blame poor, innocent Putin of anything when all he wants is what’s best for his people? After all, he definitely for sure won 87% of the vote fairly.
I feel like I need to remind you that Putin publically ignored a public warning about it.
Also, FSB is now blaming Ukraine.
Every inch of this smells like another 1999.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/23/whos-to-blame-for-the-moscow-massacre-isil-ukraine-or-russia-itself
That’s the conclusion Al Jazeera just reached.
I don’t get it either. The US has confirmed that IS was responsible.
People believe US Intelligence warned Russia of a terrorist attack, then disagree with US Intelligence after said attack happens? It makes no sense.
Hate Putin for the atrocities he’s certainly responsible for. Spreading false information obfuscates what he’s actually done.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/23/whos-to-blame-for-the-moscow-massacre-isil-ukraine-or-russia-itself
Because Putin was warned of the attack, and may have allowed it to happen to further his insane war in Ukraine.
I think intentionally not preventing the attack is definitely plausible. I guess I should have been more clear–my comment was more aimed at accusations that Putin orchestrated the attack.
Do you have any context for why IS would do this in Moscow?
Syria, Wagner, just for the Lols…
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/23/whos-to-blame-for-the-moscow-massacre-isil-ukraine-or-russia-itself
Al Jazeera has some
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/23/whos-to-blame-for-the-moscow-massacre-isil-ukraine-or-russia-itself
There’s a source. Al Jazeera has about as much love for Russia as they do China or the US.
Now waiting to see who putin will decide to make an “Islamist warlord” instead of having a balcony, windows, or tea accident.
Update: according to the last news I read, putin decided to make the Ukrainians “Islamist warlords”. Does not matter if it is at all believable or not now, does it? 🤡