WASHINGTON — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has filed a motion to oust Speaker Mike Johnson, three sources with knowledge of the move told NBC News, doing so just as the House voted to avoid a government shutdown.

Johnson, R-La., has served as speaker for five months, having taken over for Kevin McCarthy who was ousted from the top job under a similar process.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    At what point do a few Republicans not running for re-election just say “Fuck it” and vote for Hakeem Jeffries? The margin is down to what, three flips? McCarthy being so thirsty for the job that he let them change the rules has fucked them over, because Ted Cruz et al made government shutdowns and other refusals to do routine shit such a losing national issue for the GOP that once in the job, even Christian-Nationalist ideologues like Johnson have to “betray the principles” of idiots like MTG, Gaetz, and Boebert.

    • sygnius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because of the rule change, it’s going to fuck over Dems too when they take over Speaker of the House. Reps are just going to oust every single Dem elected to the position every single day. All they need is one vote to challenge the Speaker. I really hope they nullify the rule.

      • Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t think those are House rules. Those are the rules they made for themselves. Democrats don’t have to abide by this. That’s my understanding at the moment. Feel free to correct me.

        • festus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think they are house rules, but a majority of Congress can changes those rules at any time. So if Democrats take the house they can just reverse it as part of installing a new speaker.

        • meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Pretty sure those are house rules. I think they are agreed upon at the beginning of every session of congress. They can likely be changed with a simple majority but the handful of fucking-batshit-insane GOP don’t want to give up that power. I can’t imagine Dems just holding onto that rule when it should just be an essay easy vote to revert back to what it was.

          • Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            8 months ago

            Thank you! I agree, I don’t think Dems would keep that rule. Which kind of makes it only for republicans. But now I understand that they are in fact House rules that would need to be changed. Thanks again bro/sis!

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          They do. The Constitution says that each chamber makes its own rules. Whoever is in power can do pretty much whatever they like. Usually they write sensible rules to avoid a pendulum swing each time power changes hands.

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        8 months ago

        The just plain wrong. When you vote for speaker you also vote the rules in. Dems will not vote for the same set of rules and likely go back to a traditional and more sane set of rules.

      • Jaysyn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Only the majority party has that power & that rule will go bye bye immediately after the Democrats take that chamber back.

  • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    8 months ago

    An election year is a great time to blow up the only part of the government your party controls… I say let them flight.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    8 months ago

    I guess he was getting too close to finally agreeing that Ukraine needs some more support.

    • chknbwl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      8 months ago

      But who will be our representative for Jewish Space Lasers?? Imagine the atrocities of such an unchecked system!!

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    8 months ago

    Poor guy. He appeared to be completely unfit for the job, had to walk a super tightrope about not pissing off his own crazy party, and still got nuked by one of the craziest / stupidest members of his team. Can you imagine the stress? Fuck him. Let him stress. Wretched piece of shit.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was about to ask why she would do such a thing but then I remembered to my dismay that asking why mtg does shit is like asking a flat earther why they think the earth is flat.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s a difference. A flat Earther definitely thinks the Earth is flat. What Marjorie Taylor Greene actually believes is a mystery. How much of it is natural crazy and how much of it is an act?

      • Hoomod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time

        I don’t think it’s an act for her

  • btaf45@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 months ago

    Dems should make a deal with Johnson. They will throw him a few votes in exchange to allow Jeffries the ability to schedule votes. That way both parties decide what things to hold votes about.

  • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    While a lot of people are speculating about how this could lead to a Democrat speaker, I think the more likely scenario is that the Dems vote to keep him in office as long as he stops obstructing the most critical stuff, specifically Ukraine aid. Republicans alone are extremely unlikely to oust Johnson, and a failed attempt to do so only weakens the nutjobs.

    MTG is practically handing the Dems the leverage they need to force Johnson to compromise. And if he won’t they need only find three moderate / retiring Republicans willing to pick a more reasonable speaker.

    • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 months ago

      the Dems vote to keep him in office as long as he stops obstructing the most critical stuff, specifically Ukraine aid.

      He’ll agree, then backstab the Democrats the moment they try to get anything done. You can’t trust that filthy fuck.

      they need only find three moderate / retiring Republicans willing to pick a more reasonable speaker.

      I think this is both a better strategy for Democrats and a more likely outcome than Johnson keeping his word.