• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hey FBI remember when that russian plant cheated his way into the office of predisent and you fucking did sweet fuckall for years about it? Member that?

    And then, hey, and then remember when he staged a really fucked up coup to try and steal the election in front of god and everybody and y’all sat there with your thumb up your asses instead of arresting him and tearing the right-wing white-supremacy network apart to its foundations? Member?

    yeah. Yup.

  • Goku@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Lmao okay so the FBI is great when you want to investigate hunter biden

    Then when you don’t get what you want you defund them hahahaha

  • Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    8 months ago

    The Party of Law and Order, I’ve heard that somewhere before. The party that is tough on crime, is another false appellation. smh

  • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    8 months ago

    We need democrats or at least Super PACs to start commercials the fact that they are soft on crime. They want to defund the police.

    Remember that nuance is not a characteristic of the right.

    • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Democrats need to get a whole hell of a lot tougher on messaging. Biden needs to stand in front of crowds and cameras and call Trump exactly what he is: a traitor, a criminal and a dangerous Russian asset. Fuck statesmanship at this point. Trump should have never, ever been able to get this close to the presidency again, yet here we are.

      It’s not enough to just be quietly polite when your opponent wants to destroy the rule of law and order. I’m so entirely sick of watching as the Democrats blow opportunity after opportunity to win big.

      • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        The bases for the two parties are very very different.

        It’s why Republicans can, with little consequence, call Democrats pedophiles, crooks, etc.

        Democrats have a big tent, with a lot of moderates in the base. Moderates, for the most part, see democrats as the paragons of virtue, people who should stand tall while their opponents throw shit at their face and call it confetti.

        Moderates won’t vote for Democrats if they feel like they can’t be polite. They won’t vote for Republicans but simply keeping them out of the ballot box is enough for Republicans to win.

        The only good way to deal with this is as a SuperPAC. Running attack ads and forcing Republicans to play defense. But remember that conservatives have significant backing from rich assholes and they have their own SuperPACs.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Actually the corporate news media should be doing that.

        Because it’s news. and true. and important to upholding democracy. Which is the entire fucking purpose of a free press

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          That ship sailed with end of the Fairness Doctrine and rules against media cross-ownership.

      • GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        While I agree with your assessment, I don’t think it’ll have much of an impact on turn out. Everyone who’s paying attention has likely already made up their mind.

        What I think we need now is more peer to peer grassroots messaging. Get those who aren’t paying enough attention informed and motivated, while not wasting time on trying to -change- minds.

        • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well I think we agree. It’s not about changing minds but getting people fired up enough to go vote. Democrats win when voters show up in large numbers. Those not paying attention need to be given reasons to do so.

          • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            The biggest difference someone can make is driving people to the polling places on Election Day for the Democratic Party. GOP voters can walk for all I can, they better get used to it in their Gilead anyways.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think the DNC is going to have a lot of room to play around this election, given the massive amounts of campaign funding their opponents have burnt up on Donald Trump.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Hey I hate fascist republicans as much as the next guy but…… based?

    Like fuck the FBI, absolutely defund that shit, the FBI spends 99% of its time obsessed with monitoring leftwing activists and after totally being caught off guard on January 6th I think they have basically forfeited any claim to actually protecting the security of the United States. They missed a publicly announced attempted overthrow of the US government that almost resulted in multiple serving US politicians being killed or hurt, they MISSED THAT.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      This story is interesting as criticism of GOP, not support for FBI.

      Have whatever opinion of FBI you want: when the people who have made the Thin Blue Line a core piece of their personality suddenly find some police that they’d like to do away with a whole band of high-profile police, then it reveals that the thin blue line shit was just code for something else.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Have whatever opinion of FBI you want: when the people who have made the Thin Blue Line a core piece of their personality suddenly find some police that they’d like to do away with a whole band of high-profile police, then it reveals that the thin blue line shit was just code for something else.

        Then let’s take advantage of the fact that in this narrow case republicans are accidentally right and defund the FBI.

        I am getting really tired of Centrists/Democrats taking Republican positions to point out that Republicans are hypocritical, because it ends up with Centrists and Democrats taking and parroting Republican positions.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      The vast majority of convicted violent insurgents and anti-government communes in the USA are not “leftwing”. If they were defunding the CIA then I could be on board, but the FBI are the organization that investigate paramilitants and police departments in the USA.

    • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Exactly. You want people to vote for you?! This is how you get people to vote for you.

      Biden is a super tough pig supporter. Kamala even more so putting tons of people behind bars for barely any reason. They try to talk a good game but in the end support police and crime units more so than the republicans.

      So if you’re going to defund the FBI, CIA, NSA, and various police departments… I’m all for it.

      ACAB

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    “We need to defund the FBI to get back at them for trying to stop Russia from interfering in our elections,” said members of the Party of Reagan.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Republicans criticized the Bureau for investigating the more than 100 contacts ultimately found insufficiently collusive between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia during that country’s interference with our presidential election.

    If Trump were a man with a spotless record of respect for the law, Republicans might be right to call into question the FBI actions against one so highly placed.

    But no serious observer would call Trump above reproach in the face of the unprecedented catalogue of credible claims against him, including his questionable connections to Russia and the non-criminal court conclusions that he has engaged in fraud, rape, and insurrection.

    In 1973, with the J. Edgar Hoover era over at the FBI, Attorney General Elliot Richardson refused to follow President Nixon’s order to fire the Watergate special prosecutor, and so did his deputy.

    It had been an article of faith in Washington until the Trump Era that the Justice Department, including the FBI should not be tampered with by the White House or Congress.

    Thomas G. Moukawsher is a former Connecticut complex litigation judge and a former co-chair of the American Bar Association Committee on Employee Benefits.


    The original article contains 759 words, the summary contains 188 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!