• owen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Bruh. Isn’t stopping this type of activity the whole point of cannonicle controlling the store?

    • finkrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The Canonical cycle:

      Canonical solves a problem nobody was experiencing or needed a resolution for

      Canonical pushes problem resolution as a major component of Ubuntu

      “Resolution” impacts Ubuntu use negatively

      Users get the pitchforks

      Canonical kind of mitigates the issue somewhat but not completely

      Canonical goes back to thinking about problems nobody is having

      Repeat ad nauseam

      • owen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Interesting… I never got into Ubuntu because of the look but everything I read about it sounds like a headache. I’ve totally seen the exact cycle you described multiple times.

        • finkrat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I actually am okay with the appearance, but there is just way too much emphasis on doing things that the user base doesn’t care about, instead of actually fixing bugs with the product and solidifying it. Which, okay, I guess some folks are fine with that, but being the most popular distro, why try to drive so much innovation at the expense of stability?

          I just revisited it a short while ago on hardware that had actual 16.04 compatibility confirmed by vendor back in the day and it was a battery hog and a call tracing dumpster fire on 23.10. Then I switch to Debian 12 and not a single problem. I don’t get it.

      • owen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t think I’ve ever seen a more useless comment yet. Congratulations, that’s an achievement.