• TalesFromTheKitchen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    8 months ago

    I see. But 30 dollars in change are heavy and impractical to carry around. Even if it’s the same value, I’d have to prefer the Bills. My wife is rather petite and has to carry around a lot of change and says it’s tiresome at times.

    • isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      8 months ago

      As someone who has 30$ in bills, even they get in the way and manage to be obnoxious. There was a girl in my middleschool who had "a lot* of change and she was constantly miserable. I wouldn’t wish it on anyone.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        IDK if this is actually a fashion trend but, I’ve noticed recently some girls with $30 in bills going braless? Like dressed up professionally for office job, sans bra.

        I would 100% do this.

        I would be annoyed if I was unable to because I had too much change.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, a lot of women are rebelling against the idea that you have to wear a bra to look “professional”. Truly people should be able to do what makes them comfortable. I wish I could go bra-less, but my back would give out before the end of the day.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            I agree they should do whatever makes them comfortable. I also 100% acknowledge that this is a me problem, but I find it very “distracting” in a sexy way. I suspect I just need to get used to it and I’m here for that journey.

            • merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              If you noticed and are distracted (and you’re not the only one), I’d argue that it’s a them problem not a you problem. If you’re “dressed up professionally for an office environment”, that dress code is supposed to be boring, conservative, modest clothing. I personally hate workplaces like that, but if that’s the kind of place you work, then that’s the expectation.

              Assuming what you found distracting were nipples, there are ways of not wearing bras while still keeping nipples hidden or at least discrete. If someone’s supposed to be “dressed up professionally for an office job”, it’s reasonable to say that someone who isn’t making an effort to hide her nipples isn’t meeting the dress code. It would be the same if a guy came in wearing a skin-tight shirt from Father Sons.

              I would love it if we lived in a world where workplaces just let people wear the clothing that made them comfortable, but until we reach that world, people who have to dress conservatively for a business environment are going to have to cover up.

              • RBWells@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                I grew up before the trend of women being required to have shapeless lumps for breasts and welcome with my whole heart the demise of the foam padded bras and gods damned, horrifyingly named “modesty pads”. There is no way that having nipples should be considered unprofessional but here we are. I don’t like the look of the lumps and don’t like the implication that only the unnatural smooth look is professional.

                • isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I think it’s way more stigmatized in the US than it is in the EU, for example. I’ve seen a lot of nips in professional settings that I find shocking, but only because it’s made me realize how much it is sexualized? in the US. Which is weird.

        • isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I feel like we’re going back more to bra-less or “less structured” styles for all sizes, or at least I see it more, which I think is cool. A large portion of people also have pains with bras because there is a lot of shitty/predatory retailers that don’t stock “uncommon” sizes and will try to shove you into “something” so you leave with a purchase so I think it’s kind of a twofold thing. It is shockingly hard to find weird/uncommon sizes outside of online or boutique stores too which can get pricey fast, and finding or having the money to properly find a bra that fits is honestly frustrating because there is huge fluctuation between brands (when there shouldn’t be!!!).

          I personally am not a fan of bearing nips to the world so I’m forever stuck with bras/pasties but maybe one day lol.

    • “my wife is rather petite” also supports your view point on the topic.

      BUT another way of viewing the topic is that $30 in paper money only has that value because it has it written on it. If you set them both on fire and melt them, copper and nickel maintain a lot more of their value than paper currency.

      So really it can be argued either way ¯⁠\_(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

        • Susaga@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I like contactless payment, but these contactless tits aren’t for me.

          Do you remember those days when you’d go abroad and have to exchange your tits for the local tits? It was nice trying to collect them.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you ever get lost, $30 in coins will also allow you to leave a longer trail than $30 in bills, thus the change allows for more stretching of the analogy!

            • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Bro you saw the answer. They have the same value despite different sizes. It’s simple. Basic. Elementary. 😉

              Joking aside; no I’m totally serious. They should have semi-automated mammogram vending machines that pay people to get tested and they should be as common as the blood pressure kiosks at pharmacies (which should also pay people to use them). The value of catching more treatable diseases earlier in their progression would well outweigh the cost.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I came to a similar conclusion from the greentext. Big and small are valuable but one is more convenient to carry around with you (due to the mass).

      E: I think I see the tumblr users’ confusion here… the sentence

      Suppose you had $30 in coins as well, which would have greater mass?

      can be interpreted like a semicolon or separate sentence…

      Suppose you had $30 in coins as well. Which would have greater mass?

      or as a extension describing the object…

      Suppose you had $30 in coins which would have greater mass as well?

      Some might have taken the latter interpretation which makes the rest of the story incomprehensible.