• edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    I could be wrong, and/or it could just be the sets that get my attention have changed over the years as my interests change, but I feel that while the price/part has remained reasonable in many cases, it seems like there’s a shift in focus towards small details, which while the sets look nice, means that you just don’t get physically as much out of them.

  • MrDrProfJimmy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Was definitely expecting system to be more expensive over time but I’m pleasantly surprised

  • kusttra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s pretty much what I expected, which is really cool to see. The next number I would love to see is some sort of price per weight comparison. As @edgemaster72@lemmy.world pointed out, the next common argument is that LEGO sets have a lot more smaller pieces now, so if the PPP has stayed roughly the same, the price per weight should have gone up.

  • absquatulate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Interesting stats. I could’ve sworn the PPP had gone up lately. So this means that sets have been getting more expensive not because part price increases but actual part increase ( more, smaller parts in a more intricate design). What’s more surprising to me is that City, which is a System theme with supposedly no licensing, has twice the PPP of Creator.