@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 14 days agoIrrationalmander.xyzimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1283
arrow-up1283imageIrrationalmander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 14 days agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-square@rbits@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish3•13 days agoIf you have three particles, 1/3 of that is one particle. No need to divide an indivisible particle.
minus-squarethemeatbridgelinkfedilinkEnglish1•13 days agoBut if I don’t have three particles, 1/3 requires division.
minus-square@rbits@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish3•13 days agoRight, but you can have exactly a third of some group of particles. You can’t have exactly pi of some group of particles I think is what they were saying
If you have three particles, 1/3 of that is one particle. No need to divide an indivisible particle.
But if I don’t have three particles, 1/3 requires division.
Right, but you can have exactly a third of some group of particles. You can’t have exactly pi of some group of particles I think is what they were saying