@boem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agoGoogle promised a better search experience — now it’s telling us to put glue on our pizzawww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up11.07Kcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up11.07Kexternal-linkGoogle promised a better search experience — now it’s telling us to put glue on our pizzawww.theverge.com@boem@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square108fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
minus-square@ripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 month agoIt uses a whole bunch of potential sources. It is not a front-end for Bing like, say, DuckDuckGo.
minus-squarez3rOR0nelinkfedilinkEnglish8•1 month agoIf that’s the case, why not use searx? I could only see myself using a paid search engine if It demonstrably returned results relevant to my search more accurately than their competitors It was well documented that they respected my privacy and how It showed me no advertisements It doesn’t utilize SEO marketing tactics to adjust its search results It supported !bangs for very fast searching of specific websites and/or other search engines
minus-square@ripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoI don’t know about #2, but the other 4 are true. #1 may be somewhat subjective but in my experience it is certainly true.
It uses a whole bunch of potential sources. It is not a front-end for Bing like, say, DuckDuckGo.
If that’s the case, why not use searx? I could only see myself using a paid search engine if
It demonstrably returned results relevant to my search more accurately than their competitors
It was well documented that they respected my privacy and how
It showed me no advertisements
It doesn’t utilize SEO marketing tactics to adjust its search results
It supported !bangs for very fast searching of specific websites and/or other search engines
I don’t know about #2, but the other 4 are true. #1 may be somewhat subjective but in my experience it is certainly true.