• @spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    633 months ago

    i don’t personally love seeing antinatalism stuff on my feed especially since it tends to attract really nasty proto-eugenics types

    can we not, or at the bare minimum mark this nsfw?

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
      link
      fedilink
      363 months ago

      I don’t want to continue my bloodline because of looming threat of climate change.

      And also cause I’m ugly and have self-esteem issues.

      What’s eugenics gotta do with it?

      • @spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        183 months ago

        /gen is this sarcasm or are you not aware that you answered your question with your second sentence :(

        • @WldFyre@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          263 months ago

          Choosing to not have kids yourself, for whatever reason, is definitely not eugenics. I don’t even get how you’d come to this idea.

        • @spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          yes. and to be clear, it’s not eugenics to make that choice yourself. problem starts as soon as it becomes about others though. seen far too many internet conversations go from

          • “i won’t reproduce” to
          • “it’s my responsibility not to reproduce” to
          • “it’s our responsibility not to reproduce” to
          • “the poor and disabled should be sterilized.”

          this post is already getting pretty damn close to step 3 right there. reddit was awful for this so i encourage us to just be aware when stuff like this comes up.

        • @EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          73 months ago

          Alternately: choosing to reproduce for genetic reasons. Positive eugenics is still eugenics.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics

          Historically, eugenicists have attempted to alter human gene pools by excluding people and groups judged to be inferior or promoting those judged to be superior.

          Emphasis mine, though seems people rarely get called out for the latter.

    • @Syd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      273 months ago

      Curious about your age and social group. Pretty much everyone I associate with doesn’t want to have kids, usually citing the world their children would inherit. These definitely aren’t the type of people that support eugenics, in any way. Are you of the belief that we should be increasing the world’s population? If so, why?

      • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        93 months ago

        Yeah I have no idea why this person is on about. Antinatalism has literally nothing to do with eugenics. It’s all about saying “fuck you I’m not going to make more cogs for the machine.”

      • CurlyWurlies4All
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        I’ll be honest it was a huge question that hung over my wife and I when we were trying to decide whether to have kids or not. But we were in our mid 30s and it was a ‘now or never’ type situation.

        Believe it not there is positives in raising kids. We’re definitely not judgemental of people who decide they don’t want to. But I love my kids more than I knew it was possible. And we’re trying to raise them with an understanding of the world that’s a bit broader than the ra-ra pro-capital values we were taught as kids.

            • @EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              43 months ago

              “Positive” eugenics is also eugenics, i.e. nations that want more (insert racial or ethnic group) and encouraging those groups to reproduce are engaging in eugenics.

              • @spujb@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                33 months ago

                i don’t disagree but positive eugenics is literally not the topic at hand that’s why no one had brought it up

                • @EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  5
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  The OP isn’t about eugenics of any sort. No one was talking about (negative) eugenics either until someone shoehorned it into the conversation.

                  I think it is intellectually dishonest to mention one type of eugenics while completely ignoring the other type, hence my bringing attention to a topic which has already been broached.

                  • @spujb@lemmy.cafe
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    13 months ago

                    intellectually dishonest

                    ok well what do you want me to say about it lol, the conversation was kind of already had before you showed up here

        • @Syd@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          53 months ago

          People choose to have less kids since there’s less of a need to invest in human capital. It’s a conscious choice, what’s your point?

    • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      i just have a feeling raising kids will get harder and harder, because the economy is getting worse and more unequal. even factoring out climate change, its expensive to afford even my own survival.

    • kate
      link
      fedilink
      English
      73 months ago

      this community refuses to put slurs behind nsfw tags but idk i hope u can convince some

      • @spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        yeah i would also support putting slurs behind nsfw tags that kind of seems obvious to me wow

        • kate
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          One perk of running my own instance is that I can just ban ppl that post slurs outside nsfw tags & without CWs 👀😎