• neuracnu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    When you’re negotiating on behalf of environmental sustainability concerns, who would you rather be sitting on the other side of the negotiating table?

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        First-past-the-post does not. Let’s look at three scenarios:

        Scenario 1:

        Democrat: 10 votes

        Repbulican: 9 votes

        Green: 0 votes

        Democrat wins


        Scenario 2:

        Democrat: 9 votes

        Repbulican: 9 votes

        Green: 1 vote

        Tied election, decided by a coin toss


        Scenario 3:

        Democrat: 8 votes

        Repbulican: 9 votes

        Green: 2 votes

        Republican wins outright


        This spoiler effect is well-known, and why for any first-past-the-post election, it’s worth voting for the candidate with a large coalition who is closest to your position, rather than a tiny third party. You even see Republicans funding the US green party in order to damage Democrats.

        • Sybil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          if republicans are funding the greens, it sounds to me like they are closer to me than democrats.

          but i’m not voting for either of them.

          • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            While not to diminish the presidency but people REALLY need to vote more in local elections. If more people want dems locally then it will help you get a more suitable president