• @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Not at all.

    One emissary of a significant power refusing to directly intervene in, though indirectly aid, a specific power within an international war that they are not directly engaging with,

    compared to another emissary of a significant power refusing to directly intervene in, though indirectly aid, a specific power within an international war that they are not directly engaging with.

    • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      184 months ago

      Indirectly aid? INDIRECTLY??

      Aiding doesn’t get more fucking direct than sending them the bombs, guidance systems and fuses they use to commit genocide with FFS!

      • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        74 months ago

        Certainly gandalf takes a much more direct role by actively engaging the nazgul, goblins and balrog, but his role is deliberately indirect to the grand narrative.

        • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          64 months ago

          Actually, in order to match what Biden is doing, Gandalf would have to be supplying the armies of Saruman and/or Sauron with a significant portion of their swords and siege weapons, all the while pretending to tell Sauron and Saruman to please don’t kill so many people.

          • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Simply by amount of arms, I like that, but it’s dependent on gandalf and sauron having been friends for decades and coming to each other’s military aid dozens of times over their relationship because they share a mutual interest in modes of government, and gandalf being the short-term inheritor of this extremely consistent lifetime mutual dependence and support.