Edit: new and improved image, now with 100% less support! Used my expert photo editing skills to change “supporting” to say “voting for”

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    72
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    We don’t get to vote for “better” in the US. We get to vote for “less worse” or “more worse.” But not “better.”

    Better takes ages. Massive organizing. And probably some violence on someone’s part. But you don’t get to vote for “better” in this country.

    As evidence: We’re the only country that needed a war to decide that slavery was wrong.

    • @frickineh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      375 months ago

      And voting in LOCAL elections, which way, way too many people ignore as not important. We can actually have “better” in a lot of those elections, if people would pay attention. People started paying a lot more attention where I live after a council member skipped 3 straight months of meetings but still had time to go to campaign events, and we realized that there were serious issues with several council members who all voted for conservative bs in lockstep. We managed to flip enough seats that it’s now a 5-4 Democrat majority so the mayor can’t just force through her pro-oil & gas nonsense at every turn, and the new members actually give a shit about the community.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        155 months ago

        My dad is a local official and he couldn’t stop some giant, ugly, car-brained development from going in. He could only vote for the least bad one. Which is still terrible.

        So, no, I don’t think even local elections get us “better.” But “less worse” is still worth voting for because it honestly doesn’t take that much time.

        • @LdyMeow@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          145 months ago

          They do though? It would be much easier to mobilize on a smaller scale and build up. ike I’m sorry that happened to you but some places are getting better. A few areas have ranked choice which I think is a step forward. Do don’t gone up hope and keep trying to make things better

    • @AdamHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      125 months ago

      Goddamn if this ain’t the truest thing I’ve read in weeks. Just an addendum, slavery has never gone away. It built the foundation of this country and continues to be the reliable and cheaply paid engine that drives it. Slavery exists, it just has been frosted in corpo speak and glitter to fool the masses.

      • Where do you believe slavery still exists in the US? Can you give an example of humans being owned by an individual or company and forced to work for no wages in 2024?

        • @jkrtn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          125 months ago

          Sure: in prisons that are disproportionately filled with minorities, as is explicitly allowed in the amendment.

            • @Saurok@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              75 months ago

              Chattel slavery ended, which is where people literally owned other people as their deeded property. There are other forms of slavery though, like the other commenter mentioned with involuntary labor in prisons. Wage slavery is also a thing.

    • @player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      We don’t get to vote for the best option because we don’t have ranked choice voting.

      We will always be voting for the lesser of two evils because we are afraid of throwing our vote away on a third party or lesser known candidate.

      If we had ranked choice voting, we could actually vote for people we like instead of voting against people we don’t like.

      It would open the doors for so many new politicians to stand a chance against the ones who simply have the most name recognition.