• @Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      525 months ago

      If election theater motivates this policy and makes this happen then I’m all for it. I wonder what our criminal AG in Texas thinks about all this, considering he’s trying to do the opposite in cities with lax marijuana enforcement.

      • @urist
        link
        325 months ago

        Even if marijuana was descheduled, it would still be illegal due to Texas state law

        I think most states in which it is illegal would remain illegal. Many states would probably update their laws in response to the DEA descheduling it.

        • @ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          265 months ago

          Many states have laws based on the federal schedule and don’t specifically name any drugs, so there would be some immediate effects.

        • @wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          55 months ago

          If the law only references federal definitions of scheduled drugs, they would need to update their laws before this went into effect or else risk letting the population have legal weed for a short window, which likely would spur voters to try and regain their newly found drug

          • @urist
            link
            35 months ago

            Right, which is why I bothered to link Texas law, which references by name.

            My own state references it by name. I suspect many/most state marijuana laws predate the formation of the DEA but I’m not a historian/lawyer.

            • @wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              45 months ago

              Sure texas is covered, but we got a lot of states. A ton are going to need proactive laws or else risk kicking a hornets nest in an election year

        • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Many states would probably update their laws in response to the DEA descheduling it.

          Importantly too, they’d have to police it using their own state resources.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        255 months ago

        Much lower considering rescheduling marijuana is a basic government act and not a ridiculously unlikely astronomical event. Also, it would gain Biden a lot of votes.

        • @bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Also, it would gain Biden a lot of votes.

          And send the theocracy into a rage in another dimension, one in which they wouldn’t be sure why their hair is falling out

        • originalucifer
          link
          fedilink
          45 months ago

          i was under the impression the president could unilaterally just order the DEA to do it as its under the executive. is that true?

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            135 months ago

            As far as I understand it, the DEA has the independence to make the decision themselves and all the president can do is tell them what he wants.

            • sik0fewl
              link
              fedilink
              45 months ago

              Ya, it really should be legislated. I doubt that’s happening before November, though.

              • @Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                55 months ago

                Legislated implies Congress passing a law. That of course will not happen before the election, and likely not while Biden is president due to some Republicans being against the idea of legalization and also Republicans not wanting to give Biden nor Democrats a win. DEA resxheduling it is the most likely scenario that should hold up in court especially since Biden followed a process to support the change(asking for another department to review whether it is a dangerous drug, and using their response as evidence for the DEA)