this contradiction always confused me. either way the official company is “losing a sale” and not getting the money, right?

    • @Windex007@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      545 months ago

      DON’T COPY THAT FLOPPY!!

      This argument is only a “gotcha” if it was permissible use, but it wasn’t, even before CDs.

        • @Adalast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          Eh, technically it is only criminal if he distributed it. US (and I think international) copyright laws has provisions for “personal backups” of media you have purchased. There is nothing illegal about ripping a copy of a CD to your computer or burning an image of a game disc, only if you allow the copy to leave your personal possession. It is so you can keep a copy in a fireproof safe and not lose access to your property in the event of a disaster.

          Not that you needed to be told and I get the sarcasm; I am just a habitual pedant and felt the need to utilize the opportunity for a PSA.

    • @mhague@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 months ago

      The amount of people who will duplicate their tapes and CDs would be lower than the amount of people who will duplicate their digital files.

      Most of the time when a law sounds silly for banning something when alternatives exist, it’s because people themselves are silly and don’t actually go for the alternatives at the same rate as they would the banned thing. Ie gun accessory bans, ninja star bans.

            • Saik0
              link
              fedilink
              English
              45 months ago

              Anecdotal evidence is literally evidence of one (which disproves “zero” claims). Collections of anecdotal evidences make statistics making your dismissive statement dumb.

              I’m adding to the pile. I can name literally over a dozen people in my childhood who copied Discs.

              • @PunnyName@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                Start naming. Organize the names. And their experiences, and start collecting over time, if you wanna go that route. Because otherwise, you’re just some random words in the ether.

                • Saik0
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  25 months ago

                  We are… you have 3 in front of you. Out of the probably 300-400 people who’ve looked at this thread you’ve seen 3 people answer affirmatively. You’re watching it happen in real time!

        • @mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Burning CDs. That’s how I know most people didn’t know how to do it, or want to put in the effort. You had to go buy a stack of CDs, hope your computer supported burning, had to make sure players could support the burned disc (depending on if you made a music disc or data disc, if it was rewritable), and spend the time to burn the disc.

          Contrast that to ctrl+c ctrl+v.

          There’s more people who can ‘duplicate’ digital files than there were people burning CDs.

    • @TootSweet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Of those three steps, step 2 is the illegal one. (Assuming we’re talking about music and not software.) Even if you never do step 3.

      (Not saying things should be that way. Nor that it’s not difficult to enforce. Only that as the laws are today, even ripping a music CD to your hard drive without any intention to share the audio files or resell the CD, even if you never listen to the tracks from your computer, the act of making that “copy” infringes copyright.)

      Edit: Oh, and I should mention this is the case for U.S. copyright. No idea about any other countries.