• @unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    1236 months ago

    They really offered 2 possible outcomes:

    • Increase prices
    • Fire people

    Why not just . . . make less money?

    The increase was $4. The article kept using percentages to make it seem like some big scary change, but the increase is 1 meal per hour per worker. I’m pretty sure any half decent restaurant can handle that extra $4 per worker hourly.

    But no, the solution is clearly to just nuke your vacation policy so you can save $1000 per worker per year. Yeah okay.

    • @jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1226 months ago

      American notions of profit and loss are fucked up.

      It doesn’t matter if you’re profitable. Let me say that again. It does not matter if you’re profitable.

      You have to be making MORE profit than you did same time last year, last quarter, last month.

      If you don’t keep making more profit, you are somehow “losing money”. Money that’s “rightfully owed” to you. Money that should and would have otherwise been yours.

      And if you’re a publicly held company and you miss that profit goal, the stock market will PUNISH you.

      Hell, you could make more profit and STILL get punished if you didn’t “beat expectations”.

      • @fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        226 months ago

        That’s because investors only make money when the value goes up. The pressure to always make more money than before is baked into the public ownership system we created. I think we should make all companies employee owned instead of investor owned and then you’d fix the broken incentive structure.

    • Transient Punk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 months ago

      1 meal per hour per worker

      Fat Burger in LA is charging $17.29 for their most basic meal. That comes out to one extra meal per hour, per every 4 employees.

      That franchise owner is really just a cheapskate asshole.