• DarkThoughts
    link
    fedilink
    436 months ago

    The game is a solid 7 and still holds immense potential. The lack of updates combined with a lot of quest & progression breaking bugs and dismissal of such criticism is a 0 and why I wrote a negative review.

    • Encrypt-Keeper
      link
      fedilink
      English
      376 months ago

      I think Fallout 4 was a solid 7. Starfield seems to have been aiming for F4 in space but it falls short in just about every arena. I remember the settlement feature being really cool but unfortunately not very well integrated into the game, and a little half baked. I was so hype to see Starfield would be bringing it back, but instead it was entirely pointless and a total waste of time, as well as being far more restrictive.

      The main quest in F4 was at least relatable and interesting enough with some very nice side quests. Starfield has the most boring narrative of every game I’ve ever played, the mind brainless go-hum fetch quest side quests, and no interesting characters in sight. It was literally the 7/10 Fallout 4 but somehow worse.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Fallout 4 but somehow worse.

        Fallout 4 was very mid compared to FO3 and Skyrim.

        • Encrypt-Keeper
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          Fallout 4 was much better than Fallout 3. Only New Vegas on the other hand would be hard to beat.

    • @kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      186 months ago

      A solid 7? I’d give it a 4-5. I very stupidly preordered and I very much regret it. The one and only time I ever did so as well. The game shows a shocking lack of care. It definitely has some systems which ought to be interesting but they’re rendered pointless by the game and the main plot is utterly appalling.