Tainted cinnamon applesauce pouches that have sickened scores of children in the U.S. may have been purposefully contaminated with lead, according to FDA’s Deputy Commissioner for Human Foods Jim Jones.

“We’re still in the midst of our investigation. But so far all of the signals we’re getting lead to an intentional act on the part of someone in the supply chain and we’re trying to sort of figure that out,” Jones said in an exclusive interview. The pouches found to be contaminated were sold under three brands — Weis, WanaBana and Schnucks — that are all linked to a manufacturing facility in Ecuador. The FDA says it’s conducting an inspection of that facility.

“My instinct is they didn’t think this product was going to end up in a country with a robust regulatory process,” Jones said. “They thought it was going to end up in places that did not have the ability to detect something like this.”

  • @BobGnarley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    277 months ago

    “Robust regulatory processes” my fucking ass dude. Food recalls happen ALL THE TIME in the US (AFTER all the kids get sick and die, mind you) and this fucking clown wants to talk about how great our FDA is? What a joke! And youll think well, maybe its just the cheaper brands and you would be wrong. Name brands and off brands all get contaminated I swear I see it at least once a month. Just google food recalls in the past year. Not only that, a lot of the literal poison they put in our food is illegal everywhere else. UK just seized thousands of pounds of candy from us because of “illegal ingredients” What fucking deception to say that our FDA is even remotely competent. If I didnt live here, I would NEVER eat the food from here

    • @surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      287 months ago

      Isn’t the high amount of recalls the evidence of the processes working?

      This feels like saying “our border is insecure! Look at all the drugs we confiscated!”

      • @BobGnarley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        97 months ago

        A “robust regulatory process” wouldnt have 10 million plus jars of peanut butter with E Coli contamination make it to the store shelves and take months to figure out about, AFTER some people die. That happened like 1 to 2 years ago. Now a bunch of kids get lead poisoning from Applesauce pouches so we take them off the shelves and act like we have some amazing system. How about those cancer causing dyes that california is banning andNOW the FDA is talking about, PERHAPS banning them nationwide. Our FDA is trash.

      • @ThatFembyWho
        link
        English
        47 months ago

        as much as having overwhelmed hospitals is an indication of a thriving healthcare system… it would be better to have less recalls and better regulation of products to market, and similarly better to have affordable preventative healthcare to keep people out of hospitals in the first place.

        • @surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          Ah, so you would want the FDA to have broader powers and scope to reach into companies to do more preventative maintenance. Yeah, that would probably help.

          • squiblet
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            I would love for the FDA to be more proactive about food safety in a way I particularly experience it - gluten. Currently gluten free labeling is on a ‘ok, if you say so’ basis where the only regulatory action is a recall, which might happen if hundreds of people complain about a product to the FDA. This creates a motivation for companies to label accurately and test for gluten, but with the difficulty in connecting celiac poisoning to a specific product, many companies get away with being sloppy about it. The regulatory limit on the gluten concentration is also outdated. If the FDA tested more products just to check up on them, that would be great.