Amazon’s strict return-to-office policy is pushing more employees into quitting::undefined

  • @shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1106 months ago

    I disagree with the layoff angle. Know who’s quitting? The talent that can find another WFH job. Know who’s staying?

    OTOH, maybe Amazon’s big enough to survive the brain drain.

    • @Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      626 months ago

      Amazon has always been hostile to it’s employees. The culture of “step up or fuck off” permeates the entire organization, from warehouses to executives.

      • @Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        They’ve even had meetings where they express worry over running out of a viable pool of people to hire from. Because they know they are abusive AF and working for them is miserable, so turnover is extremely high. At some point turnover could surpass a population’s ability to absorb it.

        • @Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          276 months ago

          And then the problem will correct itself.

          It’s economics, but with people as the commodity being valued.

          Amazon currently has a wide labor pool to pull from, and so the value of any individual person is very low. As they saturate the market with people who are bitter and angry about working for Amazon, the pool will shrink, in this case, faster than the rate they lose people. There is a critical point where the growth of the “will never work for Amazon” pool of people will grow exponentially, and as they struggle to hire replacements, workplace conditions will improve. They will not improve before that moment, however.

          Because Amazon doesn’t see people as people. They see people as a resource to extract value from.

          This isn’t a problem unique to Amazon, everyone reading this can probably name at least one company they’ve worked for that did something similar, but Amazon is an outlier for how aggressively they’ve embraced that idea.

          This is a problem endemic to capitalism, as Amazon succeeds, more companies will be forced to adopt those practices on order to compete. Reducing the options people have to avoid Amazon like conditions, and lowering the bar for acceptable workplace culture.

          The only defense we have against this is to unionize. Aggressively. The current push should look like nothing more than a warning shot.

          If you can organize your workplace and get 75% of the employees in the union, you can write your own check. At a word, 75% of the workforce walking out absolutely cripples any employer. They know that, they don’t want the union because they don’t want you to have any power in the relationship. It’s your life, and they want the keys to it. Take the keys back.

          • @Boozilla@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            76 months ago

            Agree with everything you said. They will also aggressively replace human workers with robots, AI, etc.

            These technologies should make life better for working people, but in general I fear they will not. They’ll just concentrate the wealth even faster.

            • @Wogi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              46 months ago

              This is a problem inherent to capitalism. It only seeks to raise capital and will exploit every resource to do so. As soon as a resource is no longer useful, it is discarded.

          • @CaptObvious@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            Because Amazon doesn’t see people as people. They see people as a resource to extract value from.

            This is exactly why “Human Resources” offends me to the core. I am a person to be valued, not a resource to be managed.

          • @Boozilla@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 months ago

            True, yes, I think so, too. Though I have heard working for AWS is brutal for a white collar job. Obviously not as bad as being a driver or warehouse person.

            • @KyuubiNoKitsune
              link
              English
              16 months ago

              Working for AWS is definitely not for everyone. It’s pretty rough but generally you’re treated better than Amazon retail.

              • @Boozilla@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                46 months ago

                I work with it enough as a customer to know how astonishingly broad and deep all the various AWS products and services are. You’d think they’d treat those employees better than they do. That platform is way ahead of the competition.

                • @KyuubiNoKitsune
                  link
                  English
                  36 months ago

                  I worked in support for 3 and a half years and the best part of the job was the people I worked with. Some of the smartest people I’ve ever met. But they all had the same complaints, incorrect metric measuring, making the workplace hostile by creating a system that pitts people against each other, making what was once a collaborative workspace into a competitive one. They didn’t use the stick until you were shown to not be able to catch the carrot, and every few months they moved that carrot forward a few inches, making sure you had to work 4x as hard to meet your metrics.

                  My friends say that over the last 5 years it’s become a shit place to work.

        • @RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Just go to youtube and lookup videos of programmer youtubers. Everything revolves around “FAANG”. Facebook, Amazon, Air-bnb, netflix and google. They would drown a puppy to be able to work at these places. I don’t get it as it honestly seems very boring and stressful to me.

          Edit: just curious why people are downvoting me. I cant honestly see where i was wrong. A lot of programmers i see would love to work for these corporations. Some purely make videos about preparing for interviews for these specific companies. Or is it because i said it seemed boring?

    • @PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      376 months ago

      They probably think they are, big companies rarely actually appreciate the work their tech guys do once all the fancy toys are in maintenance rather than development

    • deweydecibel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Is the implication here that only untalented people would ever put up with working in an office?

      I know it’s not a commonly heard notion around these parts, but unlikely as it may seem, some people genuinely don’t mind working in an office. Some even prefer it. Has nothing to do with talent, everything to do with preference and the level of compensation they get for doing it.

      • @cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Talented people have more bargaining power. The implication is that nobody wants to work in the office, but some people do it because they have to.

      • @cjsolx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        96 months ago

        Yes?

        If you don’t have the skills or experience to sell yourself then obviously you don’t have a lot of options.

      • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Is the implication here that only untalented people would ever put up with working in an office?

        Not directly. The Dead Sea Effect says “those who can find an acceptable new job the fastest will leave first”. That usually means the super-stars and more-talented, but the residue behind all that evaporation isn’t all salt. Some people, even the most employable, will stick around, while their benefit/cost/risk/tolerance kind of equation still allows it.

        For some people, RTO doesn’t hit their cost and tolerance all that hard. The more unsuitable a person’s home environment is for work and how easy their commute is, that’ll greatly affect forced RTO acceptance and the Dead Sea Effect.

    • @laurelraven
      link
      English
      76 months ago

      Modern business is not exactly known for making smart long term choices, they see it as a way to easily trim the payroll to make this quarter’s books look better without thinking about what it’s going to do to future quarters.

      I’ve been seeing companies left and right shooting themselves in the foot in the same way, it’ll be interesting to see how this all plays out

    • @flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      People are staying because the job market is currently cold, especially in tech right now. Google, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, etc are all on a hiring freeze or at least a very slow hiring rate.

      However, you better bet that for the 3 days required by me, I’m only going into the office for only 2-4 hours. Showing up around 11/12 and leaving around 2/3. I’ll actually be able to work after I get home.

      • @SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        That’s kinda how I roll currently. Going to office is mainly to bullsh and chat with the peeps about current events and video games.

        I can’t get shit done at the office. Way too much distraction