• It does not achieve absolutely nothing. It sends a message of policy requirements to obtain a percentage of votes. Meaning, if dems lose enough elections by a margin that is seen voting elsewhere they will have to move their policy to secure those votes and start winning again. The problem now is with trump threatening our freedoms and democracy, we can’t afford to teach those stubborn centrists a lesson in true progressive policy.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      127 months ago

      I see, so Trump has to win in order to teach Democrats a lesson and you will teach them that by doing something they will never know you did.

      That doesn’t seem especially rational to me.

      • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        You know what is even less rational? Parroting the same shit that has been repeated ad nauseum by liberals for the past 40 years and then expecting an improved outcome.

          • Go a reread the last sentence in my statement and explain how that implies trump has to win. Ive clearly stated the problem is with trump running, we can’t afford to lose to teach the dem establishment a lesson.

    • @lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      67 months ago

      That’s not how this works. That’s not how any of this works.

      Democrats losing your vote to a 3rd party doesn’t trigger some kind of response within the party that will push them to embrace the tactics of the 3rd party that siphoned off your vote. If anything, it demonstrates to them that they should maybe push further right in an attempt to court Trump voters. But it’s cute that you believe you’re making a difference.

      Congratulations. Instead of holding your nose and voting for the one guy who COULD beat trump and avoid sending the country into fascism, your principled stand allowed a fascist to rise to power AND sent Democrats the message that people prefer fascism.

      • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        What it can do eventually is destory the democratic party, then since we are in a two party system a new more leftist party can finally move in. Afterall one of the most important parts of the Democratic party is to make sure people like Bernie, let alone anyone to left of him, have no chance to be elected. They are the biggest barrier to progress.

        • @lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          They are the biggest barrier to progress.

          You sure about that?

          Don’t let perfect be the enemy of not letting mask off fascists back to into a position of ultimate authority.

          • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            Yes I am sure. Everytime someone to the left of Bernie get’s anywhere close to power you will hear democrats like Pelosi or Schumer have “concerns” about reaching across the isle, the budget for things like universal healthcare. You’ll have them tout truisms like “we need to be a united not divided in the face of terrorism.” Just look at who fund the democrats on the local levels, parasites like land-lords, insurance companies, banks. All of these industries thrive under the status-quo. You think they want progressive taxation, universal healthcare, or non-profit banking?

      • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        What’s frustrating is that that logic works with preferential voting, but because the USA is using a shitty FPTP system, you’re right.

    • @pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      What this actually does is tell the Democratic Party that you’re unreliable and shouldn’t be catered to. Have you ever noticed how the Democratic Party gives a disproportionately prominent place to Black women? That’s because they have a long history of getting themselves involved and working to get others to the polls. Effective activists work as part of something greater.