EU stops advertising on X over hate speech. Fines could follow next year::The European Union is pulling its advertisements from Elon Musk’s X for now, citing an “alarming increase” in hate speech and disinformation on the platform formerly known as Twitter.

    • @thriveth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      207 months ago

      It is not. But it has been doing some right things when it comes to privacy protection and so on.

      Still, Trump’s border wall and caged children are merely cute compared to the shit going on at the borders of the EU.

      • @PlexSheep@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        137 months ago

        I disagree. The EU is one of the best things that ever happened to us Europeans, who knows, we might be fighting another war if history went different.

        Politically, the EU spins around between based decisions and crap like chat surveillance, but over all, it has been a major contributor to the high standard of life in Europe, I’m convinced of this.

      • @MBM@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 months ago

        Still, Trump’s border wall and caged children are merely cute compared to the shit going on at the borders of the EU.

        What kind of things should I think of?

          • @thriveth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            157 months ago

            I have. I have even lived in and right next to the widely decried “no-go zones” of Sweden, and can testify that the whole thing is a pile of racist bullshit.

              • @SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                117 months ago

                Words have implications, and you are implying these immigrants want sharia law to be impemented. Do you have examples of this? Why did you mention these cities? What’s special about them?

                  • セリャスト
                    link
                    English
                    67 months ago

                    Your only example of this is Marseille and yeah the marseille situation is obviously due to the supposed country of origin of its inhabitants and not at all by the socioeconomical context that made impossible for young ppl to live there without commiting crimes. Because that’s what’s actually happening.

          • @HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            30
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Your unchanged words:

            Until you find out it [the EU] lets Muslim immigrants (80% of whom prefer sharia law over eu law) take over entire towns & countries.

            Provide examples then. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and the burden of providing such evidence is on the claimant and no one else.

            And surely if you have a numeric figure like 80% for the proportion of Muslim immigrants in the EU who supposedly prefer sharia law, you can cite the source in which the statistic came from, and the source will list their data collection and analysis methodology which will also surely be logically and mathematically sound, right? Riiiiight?

              • @zoomshoes@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                117 months ago

                Yeah I read all your weird, totalitarian ranting, but you didn’t prove anything to anybody.

              • Buck
                link
                fedilink
                English
                37 months ago

                If you’ve ever been to Marseille, Paris or Rotterdam, you’d know that is categorically incorrect.

                I personally live in an area with a higher Muslim population, but nobody here wants Sharia Law. Nor to take over any towns.

                You should be less gullible about places you’ve never been to, and things you know little about.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        237 months ago

        Which country has Muslim immigrants taken over? Name it please.

            • @DahGangalang@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              57 months ago

              I don’t want to get in the middle of a flame war, but as someone who’s seen the culture of his small town shift over the last couple decades, I can’t help but have some sympathy for those who worry about this happening in their local (Admittedly, in my case, it’s watching a town where the suburban drops off to rural slowly be subsumed by city sprawl, so this might be a false equivalance).

              But I think the real issue is that that’s not an evenly distributed 11%. People will naturally bunch up in groups along cultural lines. I could see a city developing a single Arab/Muslim neighborhood over the course of a decade being of no note, but it sounds like some are developing multiple over just a couple years.

              I have no real data to back that notion up, but from what I hear from Europeans, that’s the general feel. I think that’s the real issue: things are changing and they feel like they’re changing fast, and that’s freaking people out. Telling people who feel that way they’re crazy only “others” them and I feel that’s really how the situation gets worse.

              But also, the towns the guy above mentioned feel like bigger cities (I’m American and haven’t been to Europe, so I also might lack perspective), and so I do feel like they’re overstating the point.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                English
                127 months ago

                I have no real data to back that notion up, but from what I hear from Europeans, that’s the general feel.

                Yeah, and Americans in general once felt that the Irish or the Italians would take over the country because they were emigrating in large numbers. Guess what never happened?

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    97 months ago

                    How did I belittle them? By saying they were needlessly fearmongering? Because they are needlessly fearmongering. Muslims haven’t taken over port towns and they won’t implement sharia law in Europe.

                • @Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  37 months ago

                  There is a big difference though. Their beliefs were compatible with Americans, everyone believed in Jesus, not killing people and such. And most importantly, the next generation mingled and married locals and they were almost fully assimilated by the third generation.

                  Where I live, and other places, most of the Muslim population (not all, mind you) keep their children from others as much as possible. The children are taught what they can and can’t do because they are Muslim. And they can only marry Muslims (conversions are allowed but the family must live Muslim lives under those rules. They are not allowing natural assimilation. Places like Denmark have laws forcing immigrant children to attend day care with locals, because otherwise they won’t.

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    67 months ago

                    Okay, but they’re still a tiny minority. They will not be implementing sharia law in Europe any time in the foreseeable future because they just won’t have that power.

                    Also, if you’re going to say belief in Jesus is a requirement for being European, you’re going to have to do something about the Jews who live there too. And considering they’ve lived there for thousands of years, maybe that isn’t a defining characteristic of Europeans.

                • @DahGangalang@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  I think this is largely a consequence of the rate of change.

                  Going from 50 generations back to 40 generation back (call it 750 AD to 1000 AD) very little would have changed for people, especially those limited in their means of transportation. I think this is largely, if not exactly, true of any generational gap (the exceptions I feel can be found at those bridging the rise and fall of empires)

                  Meanwhile, 10 generations ago (call it like 1750) wouldn’t recognize the world today. Hell, 2-3 generations ago (thinking of those born ~1925-1950) barely recognize the world of today.

                  The way I see it, the rate of change we experience in the world today is simply beyond the rate of change we were bred for over the bulk of humanity’s history.

                  With that perspective in mind, it feels wrong to hold it against people to resist parts of that change.

                  Yeah, in my ideal world, we’d all get along and be able to deal with these things in a civilized manner, but that feels super dismissive of the Human Condition and the real lived experience of people in the real world.

                  Looping back to the point I want to make: coming at people hard for having a negative reaction to a changing world doesn’t make their acceptance of the changing world any better.

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    67 months ago

                    Me:

                    Which country has Muslim immigrants taken over? Name it please.

                    You:

                    Which port town? Rotterdam, Marseille, Barcelona, etc

                    Because countries arnt yet at that level.

                    So yes you did say that Muslims have taken over Marseille. You are factually incorrect. “I see a lot of Muslims there” is not evidence of your claim.

          • @thriveth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            127 months ago

            Thinking that any political opinions are fundamentally “Non-European” is a fundamentally totalitarian and racist mindset. I reject your attempts at gatekeeping my politics based on your arbitrary and chauvinistic ideas of “European” values. But hey, there is nothing more inherently European than racism, so I guess you’re living up to your own ideals there.

      • @arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        157 months ago

        Twitter is filled with idiots who’ll pronounce London/Paris/wherever is under Sharia law. Never seems to occur to them that this is very easy to fact check.

          • セリャスト
            link
            English
            9
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            You know, you can’t imply something and complain that we understood it

          • @arc@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            77 months ago

            Nah you tried to imply something not born out by reality and got downvoted for it.

    • @whome@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Not for long we all get very right to fascist governments the next year’s and things will go south. Germany with a CDU/AFD coalition, Le pen in France, if those two happen I see a dark future ahead, but hey climate change will bite us in the ass anyway. Why not go under under fascist leadership…