@uncapybarable@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agoRed Hat’s commitment to open source: A response to the git.centos.org changeswww.redhat.comexternal-linkmessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1134file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mllinux@kbin.sociallinux@kbin.social
arrow-up1134external-linkRed Hat’s commitment to open source: A response to the git.centos.org changeswww.redhat.com@uncapybarable@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square79fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mllinux@kbin.sociallinux@kbin.social
minus-square@reddit_sux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year ago Stable is freaking old and unstable. I ll give you old but not at all unstable, wonder what instability have you found in LTS.
minus-square@JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoA lot of people (incorrectly) equate “stable” with “bug-free”. So conversely, having bugs would be “unstable”.
minus-squareSir AramislinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 year agoPretty sure the whole statement is Stable is freaking old, and unstable has lots of limitations I don’t think they’re saying Debian LTS is unstable.
minus-square@warmaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoExactly what my bad wording meant to say. Thank you for your extraordinary reading comprehension.
minus-squareGilbertolinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoI think he meant: Stable is freaking old. Unstable has a lot of limitations.
I ll give you old but not at all unstable, wonder what instability have you found in LTS.
A lot of people (incorrectly) equate “stable” with “bug-free”. So conversely, having bugs would be “unstable”.
Pretty sure the whole statement is
I don’t think they’re saying Debian LTS is unstable.
Exactly what my bad wording meant to say. Thank you for your extraordinary reading comprehension.
I think he meant: Stable is freaking old. Unstable has a lot of limitations.