• @dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    That was a cool video. But if it takes over 5000 hours of time on. I doubt that as a regular user you’re going to see any significant or noticeable degradation but after several years. 5000 is just 208 days, but it has to be continuous and severe. More realistically, with off time and varied usage, the effect will never be as dramatic as with testing. So, it doesn’t sound like something critical. CRTs were worse and people coped just fine. Just use your monitor.

      • @Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        97 months ago

        With my old plasma tv if I ever started to notice burn in I would set it to a channel with no signal so it would do the static “snow”. It forces every pixel on the screen to go full spectrum by alternating between white and black. Leaving it like that for like 5-10 mins would greatly reduce noticeable burn in. TV is still going strong after 14 years of doing this.

    • @noride@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      Newer OLEDs are also far less susceptible to burn in than older generations, I think much of the concern is still stigma from earlier models.

      With that said, I’m sure I am not alone in saying I have a rather old OLED that I’ve just used as a normal every day monitor and haven’t experienced any issues in the 6+ years I’ve had it.

      • Scratch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        I have a newer OLED and the pixel layout is trash for text.

        It’s beautiful when gaming or watching video though. So it balances out imo

      • @Dumbkid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        Yeah plasma had the same issue, by the time I even heard about it everyone said it was awful for burn in. But that wasn’t true at all buy mid 2000s