“As the president of the United States, you have power to change the course of history, and the responsibility to save lives right now,” the staffers wrote.

  • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28 months ago

    I’m not trying to be condescending. I’m just incapable of explaining this in a satisfactory way. Those criticizing the headline are not pointing out anything meaningful. The information in the article correlates with the headline. Biden has the ability to endorse a ceasefire, “while” his former staffers are urging him to do so.

    • @slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You are incapable of explaining it because it is an incredibly common and recognizable representation of a bad faith headline.

      • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        Summarizing an article and writing a headline isn’t easy. I know from experience. It may be in bad faith, it doesn’t appear that way to me. It doesn’t detract from the relevant information in the article.

        • @slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          78 months ago

          FWIW I think the administration could, should, and (unfortunately) probably won’t do more to support a cease fire.

          I just don’t think my opinion justifies misrepresenting what actually occurred in a headline intentionally.

          And the author of the headline did. They knew. And if you have experience, you know they knew.